Live data from Hacker News

UK MPs give ministers powers to restrict Internet for under 18s

openrightsgroup.org

71–75 of 75 posts

Re: UK MPs give ministers powers to restrict Internet for under 18s

#71
post #30

So now consider that the same government want to extend voting rights to 16 year olds. So you can vote but you can't control the media you use to learn about who you're potentially voting for. There is something not quite right about that.

There’s plenty of that everywhere. You can sign up to die in a war at 18 but can’t drink alcohol until 21. That’s why laws exist, to codify and resolve edge cases.

Re: UK MPs give ministers powers to restrict Internet for under 18s

#72
post #7
post #2

So the UK is now China it seems. What a shining light for democracy and justice. There is no way this will be abused by petty little tyrant minister right?

Sadly it's not only the UK. There is a global push to restrict communication world-wide. The future is very bleak for fundamental freedoms.

Meh it’s accessing and posting stuff on the internet, not that big of a deal. I’d like to see a much bigger humdrum around the ubiquitous surveillance cameras that will eventually be fed to some sort of LLM to create an omniscient eye that follows everyone everywhere.

Re: UK MPs give ministers powers to restrict Internet for under 18s

#73

If they cared about children they'd just ban phones for children. Would be dead easy to enforce and wouldn't have any effect on the rights of adults. Unfortunately I think the way we are going is to treat everyone as children by default, though.

Yep, just throw them kids under the bus.

Re: UK MPs give ministers powers to restrict Internet for under 18s

#74
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a lot of misinformation being spread about this, but it's worth sticking to the facts. And, in fact, both were charged and both were prosecuted. Connolly admitted guilt but appealed against her sentence. This appeal was denied for the reasons given in the judgment above. Jones was unanimously found not guilty by a jury at trial.

Thanks for the info. What disturbs me most is the polarization and increasing intolerance of different/opposing ideas and opinions. I'm referring to "slit their throats" kinds of reactions and "set [it] on fire". There's no "lets agree to disagree and meet half way". No compromise. That's seen as weak.

Agree to disagree with who, about what?

Re: UK MPs give ministers powers to restrict Internet for under 18s

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you give some examples of the speech the UK arrests people for?

https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/home-news/wales-engl... You can get arrested for grossly offensive (completely subjective). Also they have a category called non-crime hate incidents (Hello Kafka) where they come to "intimidate" you without any charges being filed.

You mean police acting is a non authoritative capacity to maintain public order?
Post reply on HN