Live data from Hacker News

TeX Live 2026 is available for download now

tug.org

71–73 of 73 posts

Re: TeX Live 2026 is available for download now

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> A greenfield Java implementation with an MIT license would have been useful[2] for rendering TeX inside of my desktop Markdown editor[3]. Instead, I had to rename all the Java source files to abide by the NTSPL license terms (or GPLv2, which is viral). The source files make it look like DANTE owns the copyright, so you could try asking them to relicence it. Both Philip Taylor and Hans Hagen were involved in the lea…

> then DANTE would hopefully agree to relicence it. In Feb 2023, when I emailed Hans about changing licenses, he wrote back: > We decided to stick with the GNU (GLP) license. It's not like anyone is going to check in detail what happens with NTS after all these years. We just wanted to add the option for GPLv2. We're not going into endless debates about licences, which are always a sensitive topic in the tex communit…

I guess it's not terribly surprising that Hans wanted to avoid talking about licenses :)

Re: TeX Live 2026 is available for download now

#72
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://github.com/typst/typst is an interesting competitor to ConTeXt. It's not even TeX, but somehow I tried (and liked) it before I tried CoTeXt. TeX syntax is not something I ever enjoyed in LaTeX. How much more compatible with LaTeX is ConTeXt than typst? For example, is there tikz for ConTeXt?

> TeX syntax is not something I ever enjoyed in LaTeX ConTeXt is still TeX, but its syntax is very different from LaTeX's. Nearly every command takes an optional set of key–value arguments, and everything is integrated into the core, so the syntax is much more regular. Example: %% Compile with "context .tex". %% %% ConTeXt is included in the default installation of TeX Live, so if you have %% LaTeX installed, you pro…

Thanks for the useful info!

Re: TeX Live 2026 is available for download now

#73
post #25

Personally I use LaTeX for anything I have to write as pdf, I understand many critics but... So far is The Tool to makes good typesetting. PostScript can do nearly the same at a harder effort for the user, Typist can't match, others are just LaTeX wrappers or can't deliver anything decent. The problem is that today we have a massive gap in development: there was a time when high-quality FLOSS development existed, fol…

I am an experienced dev, who learned about all the marvelous FLOSS tooling, by randomling stumbling upon it in deep dives into Linux ecosystem.

And I have no idea how it could be even remotely possible for a youngling to discover the same things in the torrent of sloppy SaaS.

Do you know of a "hitchikers guide to the FLOSS galaxy" that could teach the ways of the elders, from the ground up?

Post reply on HN