Live data from Hacker News

Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

twitter.com

71–79 of 79 posts

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#71
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How did they manage to spend 68M on it? Genuinely asking or is the number not accurate as it is clumped together with other stuff?

I don't know what event planning costs but running an event for ~10k people that includes flights, hotels, food, event space, etc. is expensive I guess.

At $6.8k/head, that's inefficient (a startup wouldn't spend like that) but not egregious if it was for e.g. a weeklong event or something.

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#72
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have to compare it to what else they could have done with the money, such as investing in their own growth, or even giving it back to shareholders if they had no good ideas what to do with the money.

I did! If they invested it in themselves it would have been a 50-75% loss, same with doing a buyback (return the cash to stockholders) at a high stock price. Dunno what better proxy I could use for how it would have went other than their actual stock price. Unless we are to think their next best idea that they didn’t invest in would have done better than all the other things they did invest in. But that’s very specul…

Maybe if they'd invested in themselves they would have been able to expand (eg. they could have hired more sales people or spent more on advertising).

If they truly were unable to find a reliable investment then they should have given the money back to shareholders instead of speculating on a non-productive non-asset with awful negative externalities.

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#73
post #44

Describing it as a “party” feels misleading. It was a company-wide offsite for an essentially fully remote organization. Was it necessary? Probably not. But I found the in-person time valuable, especially with teammates I’d never met face to face. Source: I was there

How did they manage to spend 68M on it? Genuinely asking or is the number not accurate as it is clumped together with other stuff?

Like any good company off-site. Strippers and steaks

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#74
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I believe this isn't a money thing. What are you even talking about? Why does ANY business get rid of people? For funsies? X_X

> Why does ANY business get rid of people? Some people are negative value even if their salary was $0.

Sure. Hard to imagine 40% of your company is that.

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#75
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been to all hands where it probably cost that much just in travel: business class LHR to SFO, hotel for a few nights, dinners, drinks, entertainment, venue, guest speakers, and on and on. It doesn't seem excessive, the networking in these things is often really worth it

In what business is everyone in the company going business class?

Not everyone, but often there are travel policies where any travel more than X hours long you can book business class without manager authorisation via concur and the like.

It's really worth it when you get off a 12 hour flight and have to go straight into hours of meetings without being a zombie

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#76
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why does ANY business get rid of people? Some people are negative value even if their salary was $0.

Sure. Hard to imagine 40% of your company is that.

If 40% of your company has ever been negative value than the problem starts at the top.

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#77
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$68M/10000 employees = $6800/1 employee A lot? Not a lot? Don’t know anymore.

It's on the high side, but...honestly not absurd? "Party" implies one night rager, but the source says "in-person company event." That seems more like a multi-day company onsite to me, and the total bill per person there probably includes travel, accommodations, food on top of any overall event costs. Bringing a remote employee to SF just to work out of an office for a few days can easily cost a few grand.

$6,800 per person is absolutely absurd. If the event lasted an entire month, that's still $225 per person per day.

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#78
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's on the high side, but...honestly not absurd? "Party" implies one night rager, but the source says "in-person company event." That seems more like a multi-day company onsite to me, and the total bill per person there probably includes travel, accommodations, food on top of any overall event costs. Bringing a remote employee to SF just to work out of an office for a few days can easily cost a few grand.

$6,800 per person is absolutely absurd. If the event lasted an entire month, that's still $225 per person per day.

airfare: $500, 5 nights (sun -> thur) in a hotel, fully costed: $250, per-diem of $100 6 days (fri is a travel day) is already $2350. If you rent a place that thousands can show up you'll be in for at least $5k.

Re: Block spent $68M on a company offsite in September 2025

#79

Describing it as a “party” feels misleading. It was a company-wide offsite for an essentially fully remote organization. Was it necessary? Probably not. But I found the in-person time valuable, especially with teammates I’d never met face to face. Source: I was there

What does the wording matter?

The crucial point is, was it an unnecessary expense?

Post reply on HN