Live data from Hacker News

Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

zamoshi.substack.com

71–80 of 101 posts

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#71

> A couple months ago, I found that particular bridge was next to an office building inhabited by some of my old colleagues. A start-up I had been a part of in New York. Where I was the first employee. I had owned equity. They had eventually sold for $350 million. It is depressing easy to have this happen and even worse how many people are convinced it could never be them.

For what it's worth: I know it could be me. I'm currently with tens of thousands of dollars in savings (in Europe, not American) but it could still be me. I'm quite afraid of it actually and I live every day so that it won't be me. I've noticed that reduces chances significantly, not to zero, but significantly.

Put your funds in some diversified dividend ETFs and you will be quite fine.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#73
post #23

honest question: are there not enough shelters in SF? Are there not enough jobs? I heard it's dirty and unsafe at places, isn't government hiring street cleaners and police?

Tipp: Go on YouTube, search for "SF live walk" or "San Francisco city walk" and you will get an impression

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#74
post #58
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone does drugs or alcohol, even the pope, even Jesus himself.

> Everyone does drugs or alcohol, even the pope, even Jesus himself. This phrase is only true because you include alcohol, otherwise it would be false. Not everybody does drugs.

And alcohol tends to be one of the top "people disabler" in the world

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#75
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems clear to me that the author was experiencing an unmedicated psychotic disorder and gallantly owning the preposterous outlook he had at the time. So, not bragging, just plainly stating the sort of bigger than life delusions that come with the territory.

Which parts do you think were the delusions?

[deleted]

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#76

Are people reading this or just up voting the title? Sounds like someone who screwed up their life, likely by being stubborn, and doing a lot of drugs, which doesn't take knowing how to code to pull off. Reads like a love letter to misery by someone who knew they would never be truly affected by it.

There's a good saying, "People become homeless not when they run out of money, but when they run out of relationships." This post reads to me like someone suffering from mental illness and/or personality disorder.

The blog and the contents of the post both indicate it’s someone writing about a time they were homeless and suffering from psychosis.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#77
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's incredible to me are comments, like yours, that are saying that somehow the system failed this person, just based on this blog post. When in fact: 1. He was given food and shelter, which he declined - most of his comments about the food are that it's too sugary. 2. He makes it sound like he was offered more permanent shelter in Feb of 2025, which he also declined. To be clear, I'm not making a judgment about t…

> I'm not making a judgment about this person [...] just stating a reasonable conclusion that the author suffered from mental illness. You're not making a judgment, but are somehow able to diagnose mental illness from a blog post? Wild. It's far easier to conclude that the system has failed this person, as it habitually fails millions of people in the US, in these same circumstances. Are they all mentally ill? And ev…

> You're not making a judgment, but are somehow able to diagnose mental illness from a blog post? Wild.

The author literally talks about his "psychosis" that led him to his predicament, so no, I don't think it's a judgment, just the ability to read.

> And even if mental health is an issue, does that mean that they are somehow less worthy of assistance?

I have no idea where you seem to get this idea. My point is that, at least in this author's case, he has received assistance. He discusses 2 separate instances in this post where he declined resources and support - he is living under a bridge because he specifically rejected the shelter that was offered him.

Could the process of getting people support be better? Of course, but his experience dealing with the pains of bureaucracy doesn't seem much different that bureaucratic slights we all, rich and poor, have to deal with when trying to get assistance from government. FWIW I especially liked his "I identify as a woman" comment in order to get a shower.

> The level of self-righteousness and lack of empathy in your comments is baffling.

The only self righteousness I see on display is your belief that everyone else is so uncaring because we don't necessarily think the government should force this person into a shelter. I'm not judging the author at all, but I'm certainly judging you.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is incredible how much energy is being put into justifying why this is his own fault? I guess this is the only way people with high salaries or wealth in the US can find peace with themselves - maybe that's the mental illness?

What's incredible to me are comments, like yours, that are saying that somehow the system failed this person, just based on this blog post. When in fact: 1. He was given food and shelter, which he declined - most of his comments about the food are that it's too sugary. 2. He makes it sound like he was offered more permanent shelter in Feb of 2025, which he also declined. To be clear, I'm not making a judgment about t…

Do you genuinely think that people who with mental issues ought to live in shelters as a dingitifies existence?

I think I can extend me predicament about mental illness to you also.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#79
OP here. Thank you all for taking the time to read this and beginning some conversations, even if some are harder to read.

I plan on sharing more of the story in future writings. During this particular story, I was on the tail end of a state of a psychosis, which I didn’t know at the time. I just thought what I thought. Truth to be told, I took too many psychedelics in 2024 and one day I woke up, and started experiencing a bunch of delusions that ripped me away from reality.

I had spent the majority of my life living in New York, Vegas directly before San Francisco- I was in Grass Valley.

I arrived in SF last January and didn’t know anyone close enough to reach out to. Plus my delusions were beginning to pick up, dramatically.

I threw away my cash and IDs, got rid of every item I owned, and was paranoid that my phone was tracking me. So I voluntarily got rid of it.

I was navigating all this chapter without a phone.

I obviously got out of the situation. I’m not in jail. I did successfully defend myself, pro se, against the felonies. I eventually got a job. Which connected me with people. I started volunteering on art and back in the homeless shelters. I found more and more jobs. I found a home. I started researching psychosis to try to understand what happened to me.

This was an intense experience. And at this particular moment in time, as many people in here have picked up on- one of my survival mechanisms was believing I was the hero of my own journey. I was isolated. I was lonely. My delusions were based on video games, and books, and movies, and AI, and predictions about the future. Being homeless in San Francisco- where there’s people bent over on fentanyl and an AI sign everywhere, everyplace promoting AI is sort of surreal. Especially if you are in the middle of psychosis. Jail and homelessness will compound that more.

There are many good people trying to help in this situation. Some from the HSA, the old ladies and other volunteers making food at the homeless shelter, the other hurting souls, the DA involved in my case, a wonderful woman from the shelter in Redwood City. My family. My mom. My brother. I will share some of those good stories. And there’ll be more context- as to why it was the way it was.

I suppose anything that splits people is a good thing. And I appreciate the level of insight on both sides that people give in this thread.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#80
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you needed a bed for the night, do you have friends who would offer you their couch? Family? Cousins, parents, etc?

In my society, absolutely, possibly literally more than a hundred people. Where in the world is the answer no? Maybe if you’ve freshly immigrated to a new country or something? That is a very scary thought, but it’s also scary for me to think that so many people live such isolated lives, it’s such a foreign concept to me culturally.

There is a term called low-trust society, and at least 1.4 billion people are struggling in that.
Post reply on HN