Policy in the pursuit of easy political narrative wins looks like this. US gun crime is a national issue, and therefore unsolvable in the current political climate, so useless posturing like this is what we're left with. The real fix is something like a nationwide licensing system like for cars, with auditing of weapons and weapon storage.
New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
71–80 of 861 posts
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#72I don't think they know what Ctrl+Alt+Delete means. They want to restart it? They want to go to the screen where you can switch users or sign out? Do they think it's just a fancier way of saying delete?
Reminds me of people who think penultimate is just super-duper-ultimate.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#73On a related point, trying to implement more gun control after seeing how this federal government is deploying the three letter agencies is pretty fucking stupid.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#74I don't think they know what Ctrl+Alt+Delete means. They want to restart it? They want to go to the screen where you can switch users or sign out? Do they think it's just a fancier way of saying delete?
Alter the control, and delete! In modern Windows, the three-key salute is a way to lock your session securely. Maybe that's what they mean: locking it up?
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah they should also ban metal working in New York... The stupidest thing is you can go to another state and buy a gun in Walmart, why even bother to build a plastic gun in the US?
Is this a real question? Legally buying guns in the US come with registration of serial numbers, names, and addresses. Printing a gun does not. Printing a gun also does not need to wait for a multi-day delay from a background check. Depending on the printer, it could just take multiple days to print. Asking why someone would want to do this is just not trying very hard in the conversation is actually pretty myopic.
It is illegal for the government to make a registry of gun owners. There is an electronic check to clear you as a legal gun owner but there is no registry.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#76...what? This some of the stupidest, most out of touch garbage I've ever read and clearly made by uneducated lawmakers being out of their depth.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is handled without banning glass containers.
Nobody banned anything here either.
> But the answer to misuse isn’t surveillance built into the tool itself. We don’t require table saws to scan wood for weapon shapes. We don’t require lathes to phone home before turning metal. We prosecute people who make illegal things, not people who own tools.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#78The obvious problem with this argument is that in just the medium term, world-model style AI will get good at this task, but having big brother pre-approve every print will still be bad.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
The folks at adafruit probably do know, but it does make sense if you expand the words: "Control, Alter, and Delete"
That's more charitable. Alt is still short for Alternate though, not Alter.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#80Policy in the pursuit of easy political narrative wins looks like this. US gun crime is a national issue, and therefore unsolvable in the current political climate, so useless posturing like this is what we're left with. The real fix is something like a nationwide licensing system like for cars, with auditing of weapons and weapon storage.