Live data from Hacker News

FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

twitter.com

71–80 of 200 posts

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#71
post #39

I wonder how this will work with AI stuff generating code without any source or attribution. It’s not like the LLMs make this stuff up out of thin air it comes from source material.

Llm's do not verbatim disgorge chunks of the code they were trained on.

Surely they do sometimes?

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#72
post #31

Time to create a decentralized, blockchain-based GitHub (GitCoin?) and have every commit be a transaction on the chain. Nothing would ever be takedownable.

The cost would be incredible even for just a pointer to distributed file storage

There wouldn't be an org maintaining it. You would just buy $100 worth of GitCoin and that would be enough for 10000 commits, or something like that.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#74
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The issue is that you need an account to view the replies, not that there's a moral opposition to visiting the website (though it could be that too).

[flagged]

The two are not mutually exclusive. Sometimes content is posted on a site people don't want to support, so making a copy of it and viewing/sharing the copy is preferable.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#76
post #31

Time to create a decentralized, blockchain-based GitHub (GitCoin?) and have every commit be a transaction on the chain. Nothing would ever be takedownable.

I mean, torrenting is decentralised and not technically takedownable. But it was entirely possible to make it legally painful for people involved in it, as seen in eg. The Pirate Bay, megaupload or an entire cease-and-desist letter industry around individual torrenting users Intentional noncompliance with copyright law can get you quite a distance, but there's a lot of money involved, so if you ever catch the wrong k…

> I mean, torrenting is decentralised and not technically takedownable.

It's fairly trivial to block torrent traffic.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#77

The law doesn't seem to work anymore. There are so many cases where someone can do illegal stuff in plain sight and nothing can be done about it. Not everyone has tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars to spare to get a lawyer. By the time you manage to save up the money, you realize that this system is absolutely crooked and that you don't trust it to obtain justice anyway even with the lawyers and ev…

So here we have the good guys using the law and ... at least temporarily ... winning... so what's your point?

You can see it everywhere. In this case, the fact that it took 2 years. And of course now that FFmpeg is getting more exposure in the media due to their association with AI hype, now they finally get 'fair' legal treatment... I don't call that winning. I see this over and over. Same thing all over the west.

I remember Rowan Atkinson (the UK actor) made a speech about this effect a couple of years ago and never heard about it since but definitely feeling it more and more... No exposure, no money, no legal representation. And at the same time we are being gaslit about our privilege.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#80
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What happens when you want to mix two libraries with different licences?

If you own one of them, mix in LGPL code, and publish it, the result is entirely LGPL. If you don’t own it and cannot legally relicense part as LGPL, you’re not allowed to publish it. Just because you can merge someone else’s code does not mean you’re legally allowed to do so.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN