Contrails Map

Post by smeeagain2 » Sat, Dec 27, 2025, 2:38 PM UTC

nephihaha wrote: post #60

api wrote: post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So there are papers. There are studies on tons and tons of things. One of the things you learn really studying science is that there are always papers, and you really have to immerse yourself in a field to see what’s actually happening. People who believe in chemtrails need to prove that the it’s being done, is being done at industrial scale (not just a few one off experiments), and that this is harmful to human heal…

I've never taken much of an interest in the chemtrail thing, but it does seem funny that governments are proposing to do more or less the same thing they denied doing! I can't see this being the answer though. Maybe I'm wrong, but it wouldn't be the first time environmental measures have proven destructive. Some of the most invasive pests have been brought in to control a less invasive ones e.g. cane toads in Austral…

Post by smeeagain2 » Sat, Dec 27, 2025, 3:41 PM UTC

rkomorn wrote: post #12

msuniverse2026 wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> I am just so embarrassed on behalf of people who still think this doesn't exist and is all some conspiracy without any basis. Downvoted for this, at the very least, and also downvoted for the fact you think you're entitled to an explanation even with your tone.

Post by smeeagain2 » Sat, Dec 27, 2025, 6:42 PM UTC

rkomorn wrote: post #74

smeeagain2 wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[dead]

I downvote people who express things disrespectfully, like saying they're "embarrassed on behalf" of people who don't think like them. So yeah, I'll be a totalitarian censor against people who put down others while expressing their opinions. They also requested that people explain their downvotes, so I did, but I also find it objectionable to say something like "I'm embarrassed for you, but if you downvote me, you ow…