Live data from Hacker News

Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1

egyptianhieroglyphs.net

71–75 of 75 posts

Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're studying Chinese, maybe you realized that Chinese writing works in a very similar way.

That isn’t true.

It kinda is? Most Classical Chinese and Egyptian words follow the principle "deficient phonetic + semantic part", it's just that Chinese characters are split into neat squares because most Classical Chinese words are exactly one syllable long. But the general principle is similar enough.

Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1

#73
post #72
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not even close.

Care to expand?

Sure: “yaht” and “yot” sound virtually the same (at least in American English), only maybe slightly different in the length of the vowel; “folly” and “foley”, on the other hand, sound very different from one another.

Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1

#74
post #73
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Care to expand?

Sure: “yaht” and “yot” sound virtually the same (at least in American English), only maybe slightly different in the length of the vowel; “folly” and “foley”, on the other hand, sound very different from one another.

Yes, that is my point. "Yot" is pronounced differently (as in "foley") outside of America in a lot of cases.

Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1

#75
post #74
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure: “yaht” and “yot” sound virtually the same (at least in American English), only maybe slightly different in the length of the vowel; “folly” and “foley”, on the other hand, sound very different from one another.

Yes, that is my point. "Yot" is pronounced differently (as in "foley") outside of America in a lot of cases.

Except (just to be clear) no native speaker would ever pronounce 'o' in 'yot' and 'foley' the same way.
Post reply on HN