Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're studying Chinese, maybe you realized that Chinese writing works in a very similar way.
That isn’t true.
Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1
71–75 of 75 posts
It kinda is? Most Classical Chinese and Egyptian words follow the principle "deficient phonetic + semantic part", it's just that Chinese characters are split into neat squares because most Classical Chinese words are exactly one syllable long. But the general principle is similar enough.
Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1
#72Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1
#73Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Care to expand?
Sure: “yaht” and “yot” sound virtually the same (at least in American English), only maybe slightly different in the length of the vowel; “folly” and “foley”, on the other hand, sound very different from one another.
Yes, that is my point. "Yot" is pronounced differently (as in "foley") outside of America in a lot of cases.
Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphs: Lesson 1
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure: “yaht” and “yot” sound virtually the same (at least in American English), only maybe slightly different in the length of the vowel; “folly” and “foley”, on the other hand, sound very different from one another.
Yes, that is my point. "Yot" is pronounced differently (as in "foley") outside of America in a lot of cases.
Except (just to be clear) no native speaker would ever pronounce 'o' in 'yot' and 'foley' the same way.