Live data from Hacker News

Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

reuters.com

71–80 of 738 posts

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#71
post #3

This is Michael Scott levels of managerial nonsense, bloody hell. Is Trump incapable of hiring anyone borderline competent?

[flagged]

There's a difference between "Let's use Calibri to make our documents more readable" and "Let's go back to TNR becuase using Calibri is woke nonsense by Biden's guy". They could have used pretty much any other reason to switch back to TNR, but decided to make it a childish DEI/"woke" jab.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#72
Speaking of DEI: Stanley Morison, the inventor of Times New Roman, in collaboration with Victor Lardent, was one of the founders of The Guild of the Pope's Peace, an organization created to promote Pope Benedict XV's calls for peace in the face of the First World War. On the imposition of conscription in 1916 during First World War, he was a conscientious objector, and was imprisoned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Morison#Early_life_and...>

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

There's a difference between "Let's use Calibri to make our documents more readable" and "Let's go back to TNR becuase using Calibri is woke nonsense by Biden's guy". They could have used pretty much any other reason to switch back to TNR, but decided to make it a childish DEI/"woke" jab.

Is there any evidence that sans-serif typefaces are more readable? I’ve previously seen headlines claiming the opposite.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#75
Is it too off-topic or controversial to note that in January 1941 in an edict signed by Martin Bormann, head of the Nazi Party Chancellery and private secretary to Adolf Hitler, the Nazis called for a ban on the future use of Judenlettern (Jewish fonts) like Fraktur?

https://web.archive.org/web/20151207071605/http://historywei...>

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#76
I support the change, though the rationale used for it seems to me to be nonsense.

Times New Roman might not be the world's most beautiful font, but at least is a little bit less atrocious than Calibri (which is awful). So, whatever the rationale invoked, I welcome the change.

Sometimes, when I have to work on documents which will be shared with many users, I use Times New Roman as serif, and Arial as a sans serif. Both choices are (admittedly in my very subjective opinion) better than Calibri, and it's almost guaranteed that every PC will have these fonts available, or at least exact metric equivalents of them.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#78
post #62

I have a couple of thoughts about this. Firstly, I thought sans-serif typefaces were encouraged for digital media because they read better than serif fonts. But now that high pixel density displays have permeated the market, this might be a moot point. On another note, I wonder how much of the hate TNR gets stems from its ubiquity for having been installed on almost all personal computers for the past n decades. Paga…

My understanding has always been that serif fonts read better for long text, and sans-serif for short text - so signage in Arial and policy statements in Times New Roman.

And Comic Sans for letters sent to friends finishing design school, obviously.

There are all sorts of statistical rules falling out of studies about where the long/short divide is, ambient lighting, blah blah blah - but human vision is even more variable than most biological quantities, so in the end general rules are the best one can really do.

Here of course, it's nothing more than rearranging the deck chairs, while the captain targets the next iceberg "to teach the ice a lesson!"

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#79
post #12

But you [sometimes] still have to use courier filing in the courts?

You follow the style guide or rules for the court in which you are filing. The US Supreme Court, for example, does not use Courier.

Pretty soon they'll only accept crayon.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#80
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a difference between "Let's use Calibri to make our documents more readable" and "Let's go back to TNR becuase using Calibri is woke nonsense by Biden's guy". They could have used pretty much any other reason to switch back to TNR, but decided to make it a childish DEI/"woke" jab.

Is there any evidence that sans-serif typefaces are more readable? I’ve previously seen headlines claiming the opposite.

You can find evidence for both sides, because life is more complicated than that. Do you have 20/20 vision? Hi-def screen? High contrast? Floaters in your eyes? Cataracts? Are you tired? How is the text laid out? Line spacing?

Literally all of these can impact the answer.

Post reply on HN