Earlier quoted context omitted.
Within this context, how? I do not think it can be used to argue against laws in general. Plus we have a lot of experiences now about it setting a precedent and them coming for your beloved websites. It is not even debatable today.
Laws tend to set precedents (that may be used to justify other laws)
Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
71–80 of 89 posts
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Laws tend to set precedents (that may be used to justify other laws)
Yeah, so should we have something like Chat Control and more, similar regulation(s)? It really is not so far off from banning platforms. I remember when people were trash-talking China for doing this, and now "we" are doing the same thing we initially opposed. I suppose people may only start opposing it when it starts to affect them.
Allowing everything from everyone doesn't automagically make "us" the good guys
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#73This doesn’t strike me as “bad”. Seeing the content on Twitch and how parasocial it is, it doesn’t seem healthy for kids under 18 tbh. Like Facebook was the craze when I was exiting highschool, and then it was instagram/snapchat/twitter through college. “Quitting” social media was one of the healthiest adult choices I ever made—comparison is the thief of joy, blah blah blah.
I see what you're saying, but it's a little bit ironic that you write this on a social media platform. Granted, a more niche and focused one with not all of the misgivings of the big platforms, but still.
2) but even as such I don’t consider HN to be a social media platform. It’s more of an RSS feed/forum + comments. Sure it’s a social media platform in the clinical definition. But there are no dark patterns AFAICT, no explicit advertisements to support funding, no corporate-powered psy-op campaigns to sway public opinion.
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, so should we have something like Chat Control and more, similar regulation(s)? It really is not so far off from banning platforms. I remember when people were trash-talking China for doing this, and now "we" are doing the same thing we initially opposed. I suppose people may only start opposing it when it starts to affect them.
"we" do what china did because they're beating us at our own games. It's "free market" until BYD shows up, it's "no regulations" until tiktok shows up Allowing everything from everyone doesn't automagically make "us" the good guys
I never implied this, that would be silly on many fronts.
Are you in favor of Chat Control or not? Why?
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Laws tend to set precedents (that may be used to justify other laws)
Yeah, so should we have something like Chat Control and more, similar regulation(s)? It really is not so far off from banning platforms. I remember when people were trash-talking China for doing this, and now "we" are doing the same thing we initially opposed. I suppose people may only start opposing it when it starts to affect them.
I am just not swayed by the slippery slope argument because as someone else said, it can be used for anything.
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, so should we have something like Chat Control and more, similar regulation(s)? It really is not so far off from banning platforms. I remember when people were trash-talking China for doing this, and now "we" are doing the same thing we initially opposed. I suppose people may only start opposing it when it starts to affect them.
I am also wary of things like government owned encryption backdoors and ChatControl, mostly because I feel like like society should be resilient to authoritarian takeovers (and they always seem to happen much faster than we would expect, we'll see if see the US gets another fair election in 2028) I am just not swayed by the slippery slope argument because as someone else said, it can be used for anything.
I do not care about Twitch and I consider Facebook outright harmful, but I do not think they should be banned. I have not fully read the article, but I bet it is "think of the children", a really old justification for "I want more control", a classic power grab.
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least for Twitch that means they can't give money to streamers making a small country's GDP a month.
Almost all streamers have some thirdparty "tip/donation" system set up (usually streamelements/streamlabs via paypal or stripe, sometimes also giving some TTS effects on stream) so that's still possible.
I tried donating via one of these a while ago and got stopped by a requirement to link a Twitch account. Could you give an example of a donation page on there without that requirement?
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#78This doesn’t strike me as “bad”. Seeing the content on Twitch and how parasocial it is, it doesn’t seem healthy for kids under 18 tbh. Like Facebook was the craze when I was exiting highschool, and then it was instagram/snapchat/twitter through college. “Quitting” social media was one of the healthiest adult choices I ever made—comparison is the thief of joy, blah blah blah.
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#79I wonder what the reasoning can be to ban Twitch and TikTok but not YouTube. Because I highly doubt that YouTube will ever be banned. Yet YouTube has shorts and a devilish algorithm, just like TikTok.
"The Australian government has so far named ten platforms to be included in the ban: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, Reddit and streaming platforms Kick and Twitch. " Why do you think it is not included?
Re: Streaming platform Twitch added to Australia's teen social media ban
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A shop showing pornography openly or use of various sex fetish toys while selling also bread is still inaccessible to any kid, so thats a pretty weak argument. Worst defines the overall situation. A more appropriate analogy would be a shop with a clearly marked and separate "Adults Only section" > these steps are good or at least well-intended. I might agree that they're well-intended - but the road to hell is pave…
>shop with a clearly marked and separate "Adults Only section" But it's not. Most of them don't even have the useless "are you +18" yes/no button. They are literally featured and recommended on the homepage.