Live data from Hacker News

Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

bleepingcomputer.com

71–80 of 318 posts

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#71
post #3

We should make residential proxies illegal

breaking the law by using wireguard to access my home network, hmm, great idea.

Ok, I'll be a bit more specific, banning businesses and the trade of proxies that are purposefully marked as residential, in order to evade firewall blocks, and even to evade proxy blocks.

You gotta draw the line in the sand somewhere, VPNs are already morally dubious, but if you ban the most shady of VPNs, residential proxies, then you can at least guarantee service providers the right to deny service to proxy users, while allowing proxy users to use the proxy everwhere they are welcome in.

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#72

> it suddenly ballooned in size in April 2025 after its operators breached a TotoLink router firmware update server and infected approximately 100,000 devices This is scary. Everyone lauds open source projects like OpenWRT but... who is watching their servers? I imagine you can't run an army of security people on donations and a shoestring budget. Does OpenWRT use digital signing to mitigate this?

Why, OpenWRT firmware and packages are both signed, of course. You can manually and independently check the image signature before flashing an update.

The build infrastructure is, of course, a juicy target: infect the artifact after building but before signing, and pwn millions of boxes before this is detected.

This is why bit-perfect reproducible builds are so important. OpenWRT in particular have that: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-developer/security#reproducib...

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#73
post #46
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. Only way is to secure your IoT devices/routers/cameras/etc.

Through personal responsibility? That is not scalable; look at how many compromised devices there are. We need a better solution as an industry.

Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle.

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

we were getting hit with attacks like this daily at some point and were forced to use cloudflare magic transit it's pretty random and you shouldn't read too deep into it as nearly every anti-ddos solution, host and isp has been hit with this botnet by now.

but why? For fun?

I used to run servers for a very popular service. I'm 99% sure people DDoSed our www for lolz and also to kick the tires on DDoS as a service vendors. We would get DDoS on a pretty regular basis, for exactly 90 seconds, +/- a few nodes that had bad clock sync and were 2 seconds off; which was exactly what you get from a free trial at DDoS as a service. I feel like we got a ransom request like once; but I can't remember if it actually corresponded to an attack, if it did, I don't think it was consequential.

Thankfully, it was almost always targetted at our www servers, which were not important for our service. Very occasionally, we'd get hit on the machines that we actually ran our service on, but between the consistent DDoS on www, and our own self-inflicted DDoS from defects in the client code we wrote for our users, our service was well prepared... if the DDoS went over line rate for the server, our hosting provider would null route it [1], but otherwise, we could manage line rate of udp reflection or tcp syn floods and what have you. From what I could tell, most attackers didn't retarget to our other servers when one got null routed.

[1] They did try a DDoS scrubbing service, but having our servers behind the scrubber was way worse than just null routing. Maybe the scrubbing could have been tuned, but as it was, it was better for us to just have the attacked servers lose connectivity to the public network.

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#76
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but why? For fun?

I used to run servers for a very popular service. I'm 99% sure people DDoSed our www for lolz and also to kick the tires on DDoS as a service vendors. We would get DDoS on a pretty regular basis, for exactly 90 seconds, +/- a few nodes that had bad clock sync and were 2 seconds off; which was exactly what you get from a free trial at DDoS as a service. I feel like we got a ransom request like once; but I can't rememb…

> self-inflicted defects

is what I'll call bugs from now

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#78
post #60

> it suddenly ballooned in size in April 2025 after its operators breached a TotoLink router firmware update server and infected approximately 100,000 devices This is scary. Everyone lauds open source projects like OpenWRT but... who is watching their servers? I imagine you can't run an army of security people on donations and a shoestring budget. Does OpenWRT use digital signing to mitigate this?

Digital signing wouldn't defend you from a compromised build server.

What in that act says OpenWrt would be made illegal? If anything, OpenWrt would roll out automated security updates for a supported branched release to comply with these regulations.

Also, if you actually read it, there are exceptions for open source software!

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#79

IoT is just wave after wave of unsecure devices. There's gotta be a better way.

fun fact, part of the reason this botnet exists is because europe required the ability to install security updates unattended that you cannot disable and they compromised one of the servers that had the capability to push these updates compromising hundreds of thousands of routers.

Wait when was this?? Did it fly under the news??

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#80
post #63
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> have something better than this wild west lawlessness. Careful what you wish for. Before you know it you can't have an IP without your ID.

This is already the case in Germany and many other countries. Same for phone numbers. On the other hand, I get no spam calls, and I can't access the sites on https://cuiiliste.de/domains - censorship is amazing.

Yes, surely the German government telling it's people what to do has never gotten them in trouble in the past...
Post reply on HN