Live data from Hacker News

Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

theguardian.com

71–80 of 124 posts

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#71
post #46
post #15

The Gulf States are seeing absolutely excellent ROI for the 1b they pooled together for a 747.

You mean having their capital bombed with zero response from U.S.-supplied air defense systems is great ROI?

tbf they were attacked with albms and presumably the US didn't supply the space-based sensing part of the defenses.

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OT but i think the 747 story deserves a bit more nuance. First of all to be clear i'm dismayed by the idea. It's not great optics that Trump wants to keep the plane (library force one?) . Even accepting it in the first place is also odd. Add to that, using it as Air Force One seems to be impractical. BUT, there is precedent for this move. They gifted an even more expensive plane to Erdogan. From what i understand the…

> Even accepting it in the first place is also odd illegal. That's the word you're looking for. The Constitution is absolutely clear on this: POTUS is not allowed to accept foreign gifts without authorization of Congress. To this day, Trump has neither sought nor received Congressional authorization.

The gift was to the American people accepted on our behalf by the felon. It is public property that just needs to be declared inoperable when he is out of office so he can't use it illegally.

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#73
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Even accepting it in the first place is also odd illegal. That's the word you're looking for. The Constitution is absolutely clear on this: POTUS is not allowed to accept foreign gifts without authorization of Congress. To this day, Trump has neither sought nor received Congressional authorization.

This is the emoluments clause: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.[5] And the reason they put that there is the obvious one: this is as corrupt as corrupt gets.

More what you'd call "guidelines"...

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#74
The biggest benefactor here is Meta. There's no way TikTok will remain a dominant social platform in the US amidst all the political meddling and so many high profile investors with competing interests.

This is likely also why Meta announced that they are overhauling Instagram to make Reels and recommendations the default experience - https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/instagram-overhaul-app-num.... Just as with Threads, they saw an opening and are doubling down hard.

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#75
post #74

The biggest benefactor here is Meta. There's no way TikTok will remain a dominant social platform in the US amidst all the political meddling and so many high profile investors with competing interests. This is likely also why Meta announced that they are overhauling Instagram to make Reels and recommendations the default experience - https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/instagram-overhaul-app-num... . Just as with Thre…

We could be spending all this effort on curing diseases...how stupid we can be.

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#76

The ideal scenario isn't the government forcing a sale of TikTok for political reasons. The ideal is that people stop using TikTok because they realize it's not good for them, but I guess I don't see that happening. Instead we'll just continue scrolling while wondering why we're so unhappy and angry all the time.

IMO the ideal is incredibly strong data privacy laws such that it does not matter if consumer products are owned by a rich guy in Mountain View or Abu Dhabi.

Privacy (a big issue) is the least of our problems with media ownership by hyper-elite royalty.

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#77
post #37

> MGX, chaired by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, will take 15% stake, with social media firm valued at $14bn So they value the most attention owing social media at a mere $14b? As reference: Meta has a total market cap of around $1.8 T.

For what it's worth, this is just TikTok US, not TikTok as a whole. Make of that what you will.

still looks small if simplifying and counting just by global population would be 340/8100*1800 = ~$75B. Besides US market is more profitable.

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#78
post #37

> MGX, chaired by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, will take 15% stake, with social media firm valued at $14bn So they value the most attention owing social media at a mere $14b? As reference: Meta has a total market cap of around $1.8 T.

For what it's worth, this is just TikTok US, not TikTok as a whole. Make of that what you will.

Are the US Tiktok infra, network and user feeds separated from the rest of the world?

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#79
post #12

Congratulations to the US on taking soverign control over their TikTok feed.

Congratulations to TikTok for avoiding being kicked out of the US market.

Technically they are kicked out of the US market. Their app, content and users siezed and handed to another party.

Re: Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US

#80
post #37

> MGX, chaired by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, will take 15% stake, with social media firm valued at $14bn So they value the most attention owing social media at a mere $14b? As reference: Meta has a total market cap of around $1.8 T.

"Sell to our preferred investors for pennies on the dollar or lose access to the most lucrative market in the world". It's not like TikTok had a choice.
Post reply on HN