Earlier quoted context omitted.
You asked why it was upvoted and I gave you the reason. That the referenced post has quality content and some quality discussion is not a rejection of that. I referenced that post not because it is analogous to this post but that the discussion on it is revelatory (which is clear by what I said). Hacker News truly has a large number of topics for which the reactions and responses are reflexively negative and large in…
The problem here is that you're talking about the comments on the submission, whereas I was not. I'm talking about the upvotes on the submission. It's entirely expected and unsurprising that Apple's announcement of a major macOS release would receive a ton of upvotes, regardless of how people feel about the release. That's why I think your analogy is irrelevant. A low quality submission should not receive many upvote…
I think the idea that one behavior being used as evidence for another behavior is problematic is ridiculous.