Thunderbird Pro August 2025 Update • Hacker News Board

Re: Thunderbird Pro August 2025 Update

#71

Post by mnmalst » Sat, Aug 23, 2025, 7:31 AM UTC

godelski wrote: post #69

jraph wrote: post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And they are still technically somewhat Mozilla indeed (but note this commenter wrote they fully agree with my comment)

Ok? And being Mozilla is a problem why? And what is the alternative and why?

Where did I imply it's a problem? I merely corrected the answer above me which claimed they are "NOT Mozilla anymore".

Re: Thunderbird Pro August 2025 Update

#72

Post by jraph » Sat, Aug 23, 2025, 7:33 AM UTC

godelski wrote: post #69

jraph wrote: post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And they are still technically somewhat Mozilla indeed (but note this commenter wrote they fully agree with my comment)

Ok? And being Mozilla is a problem why? And what is the alternative and why?

Please reread carefully. There's actually no disagreement here. You are being too confrontational. I understand why you could be, but you can relax here.

Re: Thunderbird Pro August 2025 Update

#73

Post by godelski » Sat, Aug 23, 2025, 9:05 PM UTC

jraph wrote: post #72

godelski wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok? And being Mozilla is a problem why? And what is the alternative and why?

Please reread carefully. There's actually no disagreement here. You are being too confrontational. I understand why you could be, but you can relax here.

[dead]

Re: Thunderbird Pro August 2025 Update

#74

Post by jraph » Sun, Aug 24, 2025, 4:11 PM UTC

jraph wrote: post #72

godelski wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok? And being Mozilla is a problem why? And what is the alternative and why?

Please reread carefully. There's actually no disagreement here. You are being too confrontational. I understand why you could be, but you can relax here.

Your reply is dead. None of us two are doing what you say. I'm not hating anybody or anything here, and stating it even less.

There must be some big misunderstanding here.

The other commenter only corrected something I wrote that was technically wrong and I read their comment as quite neutral. And my initial comment was an answer to what actually felt undeserved and misplaced hate. I was pushing back hate.