Live data from Hacker News

Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

lanl.gov

71–80 of 106 posts

Re: Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

#71
It's an apples-to-oranges comparison, but I'm reminded of the ~10^12 fps (1.7 ps exposures) demonstrated in work at MIT[0], which was for a completely different application.

[0] https://web.media.mit.edu/~raskar/trillionfps/

EDIT: Video with explanation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtsXgODHMWk

Re: Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

>What if DOGE savings create more money for important science? >Your answer to this question determines whether you believe in ideology or data. I've upvoted your comment to give you time to show us your data.

Interesting reason to upvote. Would have never thought of it but kinda makes sense!

Re: Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

#73
post #28

Why are science communicators so consistently missing the mark? Is it not obvious that if you're writing an article proclaiming to capture _explosions_ at 7mths of a second, people want to see some pictures of said explosions? Clearly they're understanding that explosions are a hook to grab the reader's attention, but then they just don't include any of the resulting pictures? C'mon y'all! We need to do better here!

https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/prad-future-sto ...

404 for me in Germany.

Re: Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

#74
post #17

7mths? What unit is that. Did they mean 7μs resolution? How is that special? I see youtubers doing nanoseconds. edit: here is the important information in this article. > Scorpius is a new accelerator project planned for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) that will use an electron beam that can be broken into customized pulses to deliver x-rays and capture multiple images only hundreds of nanoseconds apart. So…

I read it as months. Super confusing.

Re: Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

#75
post #28

Why are science communicators so consistently missing the mark? Is it not obvious that if you're writing an article proclaiming to capture _explosions_ at 7mths of a second, people want to see some pictures of said explosions? Clearly they're understanding that explosions are a hook to grab the reader's attention, but then they just don't include any of the resulting pictures? C'mon y'all! We need to do better here!

https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/prad-future-sto ...

Page not found :(

Re: Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

#76
post #17

7mths? What unit is that. Did they mean 7μs resolution? How is that special? I see youtubers doing nanoseconds. edit: here is the important information in this article. > Scorpius is a new accelerator project planned for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) that will use an electron beam that can be broken into customized pulses to deliver x-rays and capture multiple images only hundreds of nanoseconds apart. So…

The first line of the articles says "seven-millionths of a second", which would be 1/7μs or 0,14μs. They also mention that the camera shot 16 frames in that period, so that would be once every 0,00875μs or once every 8,75ns Youtubers are a couple of magnitudes away from that, AFAIK

I understood the article just fine, despite the spurious hyphen. The HN title could be improved immensely if it just said 7 microseconds.

Re: Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

#80
post #17

7mths? What unit is that. Did they mean 7μs resolution? How is that special? I see youtubers doing nanoseconds. edit: here is the important information in this article. > Scorpius is a new accelerator project planned for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) that will use an electron beam that can be broken into customized pulses to deliver x-rays and capture multiple images only hundreds of nanoseconds apart. So…

The first line of the articles says "seven-millionths of a second", which would be 1/7μs or 0,14μs. They also mention that the camera shot 16 frames in that period, so that would be once every 0,00875μs or once every 8,75ns Youtubers are a couple of magnitudes away from that, AFAIK

The slow mo guys did a video [1] at 10 trillion FPS. They also recently did another video [2] at 5,000,000 FPS. Their other videos vary between 50,000 FPS and 850,000 FPS.

Edit: They mention in [2] that the Phantom camera they have can go to a 95ns exposure up to 1,750,000 FPS.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ys_yKGNFRQ&pp=ygUMc2xvdyBtb...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTkZ36g4GOs

Post reply on HN