Live data from Hacker News

Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

nothing-to-watch.port80.ch

71–80 of 86 posts

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#71
Author here. The Cloudflare traffic led me here - apologies for all the bugs and crashes. This was semi-leaked. I only shared the link on a small subreddit yesterday, I'm aware of loads of bugs and it’s never been tested on anything beyond a ThinkPad and an iPhone.

To those criticizing the UI: agreed. To those criticizing the movies: also agreed :D

As some commenters have already pointed out, it’s more of a tech demo than anything.

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#72

This is fricking awesome. It's the coolest thing I've seen on HN for a while. Love it! N.B. I visit HN multiple times per day. I've been a member of HN since 2010. My last comment was made in 2018. I logged in for the first time in years just to make this comment :-)

Author here - thanks for the kind words!

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#73
post #24
post #8

IDK, possibly the worst UX I've ever interacted with.

Idk why people are always so harsh online. This is clearly stated as "experimental".

Experiments can fail. It's ok for them to fail. And while this one looks pretty cool, it's not usable, at all. Hence the comment.

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#74

Somehow I swirled around for a minute or so and didn't see anything I would want to watch. "This gallery features a collection of the 50,000 most popular* movies according to TMDB" Yeah, there's the problem. I went to the TMDB site and tried sorting by popularity, rating … all I got was a whole bunch of recent films that look like all the reasons the film industry is crashing (you know, the kind of stuff you would se…

Snatch (2000) isn't on it? Blasphemous.

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#75

https://opensearch.westloop.io/poster We created this as a demo for OpenSearch on AWS (we are AWS partners) but I really enjoyed making it and I thought it turned out to be really fun. Took the same type of dataset at the OP (I think we have 80,000 posters) but we used AWS’ multimodal embedding model to enable semantic search across the posters, as well as the ability to do a similarity search based on the posters. E…

where do I get the dataset?

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#77
post #74

Somehow I swirled around for a minute or so and didn't see anything I would want to watch. "This gallery features a collection of the 50,000 most popular* movies according to TMDB" Yeah, there's the problem. I went to the TMDB site and tried sorting by popularity, rating … all I got was a whole bunch of recent films that look like all the reasons the film industry is crashing (you know, the kind of stuff you would se…

Snatch (2000) isn't on it? Blasphemous.

I'll add it – two minutes Turkish.

Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels is on it, which arguably is a better film.

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#78

Somehow I swirled around for a minute or so and didn't see anything I would want to watch. "This gallery features a collection of the 50,000 most popular* movies according to TMDB" Yeah, there's the problem. I went to the TMDB site and tried sorting by popularity, rating … all I got was a whole bunch of recent films that look like all the reasons the film industry is crashing (you know, the kind of stuff you would se…

[dead]

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#79
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That list has Avatar and La La Land on it. It’s definitely not elitist! There’s some real gems on lists like this but some of the older stuff would definitely be a slog for most people and would probably need to be put into context to make sense. Recently I’ve engaged in a practice of just hitting play on any old movie on Prime with at least an actor or director or even studio I’ve heard of. Essentially any film from…

> with at least an actor or director or even studio I’ve heard of I think that's the gist: anything goes, and maybe start with 3 of anything! ...based on genre (Comedy): Tampopo (1985), Matchstick Men (2003), Force Majeure (2014) ...based on subgenre (Heist): The Killing (1956), Thief (1981), Sexy Beast (2001) ...based on director (Kelly Reichardt): Old Joy (2006), First Cow (2019), Showing Up (2022) ...based on prod…

> based on subgenre (Heist):

If you have not seen the OG "Topkapi (1964)" you missed a real gem.

Re: Nothing to watch – Experimental gallery visualizing 50k film posters

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, disappointed that, even in your anecdotal list above, three of the five are in the last dozen years.

Two of the five, with not a single movie from the same decade. Given the production rate of movies has not been constant either, is this really more than the statement "I only want to see old movies"?

I don;t think so — it's just that if you have 100-ish years to choose from, this doesn't seem like a very even spread. To be sure, I would feather off anything too early — the silent era seems only interesting to film historians that want to see where the modern ideas of film began (example: "Battleship Potemkin" (1925)).

But at the same time, Hollywood does seem to have fallen into the trap of mediocrity for some time now — probably since the 1980's to be honest (having only gotten worse over the ensuing decades). "La La Land" was popular in large part because it was something of a throwback to 1930's Hollywood. Tarantino's success seems to stem from his mining of gritty 1970's Hollywood.

So why not go back and watch "Gold Diggers of 1937" for the "La La Land" stuff, or "Straw Dogs" (1971) to see what Tarantino is making homage to.

Post reply on HN