Live data from Hacker News

macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

eclecticlight.co

71–80 of 152 posts

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#71
post #58
post #52

I have a meta question not directly related to the article but more about HN itself. I posted this exact link 9h before this submission was posted[1]. How is it possible that there is a new entry for the submission given the link is the same? [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=eclecticlight.co

Dupes are allowed after some number of hours.

I thought that number was significantly more than 9.

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#72
post #58
post #52

I have a meta question not directly related to the article but more about HN itself. I posted this exact link 9h before this submission was posted[1]. How is it possible that there is a new entry for the submission given the link is the same? [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=eclecticlight.co

Dupes are allowed after some number of hours.

I think it is time * (votes+comments).

In practice, if it gets any real amount of votes or comments, you have to wait a year to repost. If it doesn't get any attention, it can be reposted quickly (though I think it should be a day later).

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#73
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

3rd party supporting a file system would be one of the last things on a list of all software I’d ever want a 3rd party writing instead of the OS maker. Nightmare to evaluate the options, pure stress testing the options, difficult to know if it didn’t mess something up.

> 3rd party supporting a file system would be one of the last things on a list of all software I’d ever want a 3rd party writing instead of the OS maker. Given how many people use FUSE, Paragon NTFS for Mac, and similar tools, you're hardly totally representative.

> Given how many people use FUSE

What percentage of MacOS users even know what that is. I mean I am in the percent but I know it's sub 0.001

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#76
I skimmed through the article, but I have a question that I hope someone can answer. I have a sparse disk image created on a NAS (which runs Linux), and I use it to backup some stuff (not a VM) from the Mac in the native format (the macOS APFS file system).

Would this new format, ASIF, make this faster and better whenever I switch to macOS Tahoe? I hope there wouldn’t be any gotchas with respect to storing this disk image on a NAS.

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#77
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 3rd party supporting a file system would be one of the last things on a list of all software I’d ever want a 3rd party writing instead of the OS maker. Given how many people use FUSE, Paragon NTFS for Mac, and similar tools, you're hardly totally representative.

> Given how many people use FUSE What percentage of MacOS users even know what that is. I mean I am in the percent but I know it's sub 0.001

Well there’s at least two of us.

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#78
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple recently made FSKit a supported/documented API, which should allow third-parties to add support for other filesystems: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/fskit?language=obj...

3rd party supporting a file system would be one of the last things on a list of all software I’d ever want a 3rd party writing instead of the OS maker. Nightmare to evaluate the options, pure stress testing the options, difficult to know if it didn’t mess something up.

[deleted]

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#79
post #74

[flagged]

I think this is actually a human struggle - I add Conclusions to my blog posts / dev guides because it feels awkward to just end with the last step.

But it also always feels like I am just awkwardly restating things I just said. It's not a thesis, an article generally not complicated enough to need a re-synthesizing of main points at the end.

Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format

#80
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends. I tried posting a few links I came across over the past few days, and it just showed me dups but they were from days or weeks or sometimes months ago.

Not sure why this comment is downvoted. Yes, I got redirected for a dupe earlier today for something posted 7 months ago. And even though the content substantially changed, it can’t be posted again.

I seem to remember getting that and having the option to post it again. Maybe it’s a karma related thing.
Post reply on HN