Live data from Hacker News

Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

skarlso.github.io

71–80 of 116 posts

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#71
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> we don't know how to change our car's oil anymore because we have a robot that does it OK, are we worried that all the robots will somehow disappear? Why would I have to change my own oil, ever, if the robot did it as well as I did? If it doesn't do it as well as I did, I'm still doing it myself.

> OK, are we worried that all the robots will somehow disappear? No, you should be worried that you (or devs who come later, who never had to 'change the oil'/ write tests themselves) won't know if the robot has done it right or not, because if you can't do the work, you can't validate the work. And the robot isn't an employee, it's just a tool you the employee use, so when you are asked whether the test was coded co…

> See the issue now?

No. I use a calculator, and I don't have to second-guess it. It just works. If it didn't work reliably, I would use it.

> I thought your unnecessary skill atrophied and was forgotten ?

Again, either I didn't need to do it because the AI did it well, and I forgot the skill, or it never did it well, I always did it myself, and I never forgot it. I don't understand why you're assuming that the AI will do it well enough at first that I'll forget how it's done, and that it will then somehow get bad at it so I'll have to start doing it myself again.

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#72

> And as a last point, I fear very much what’s going on in schools. My son is in school. And the teacher literally said they need to use an LLM otherwise they won’t score high enough because the other pupils are using LLMs and the teacher is using an LLM to grade/check it. This is ridiculous. And if you think that’s okay or you don’t see a serious problem with this, then that’s an even greater problem. If that is tru…

Any examination that isn't done in person on general course material (nothing an LLM could prepare for you) is just stubborn refusal to protect students from themselves in an age where anything else can be faked. Graded homework and take-home assignments are dead as useful pedagogical tools.

Death of homework could be a great thing. The education system teaching that schoolwork must be done at home is conditioning future workers to accept working late and taking their work home.

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#73

> And as a last point, I fear very much what’s going on in schools. My son is in school. And the teacher literally said they need to use an LLM otherwise they won’t score high enough because the other pupils are using LLMs and the teacher is using an LLM to grade/check it. This is ridiculous. And if you think that’s okay or you don’t see a serious problem with this, then that’s an even greater problem. If that is tru…

I hear you, but also we need to ask why is it a problem? Used to be, it was considered critically important that students learn to write in cursive and to multiply 3 digit numbers in their head. I can't do either, and I suspect many folks these days can't either. The world has not ended. I also can't tie a square knot, lasso a steed, or mend a fence. School assignments have always been a waste of time. Essay-writing…

> Essay-writing is not a critical skill,

Essay writing is mainly about organizing thoughts logically. That's pretty important.

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#74
I can't shake the belief that the more one finds LLMs useful, the less valuable their work already is.

Something that has no guarantee,not even a reassurance of being correct should not be trusted with any meaningful work

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#75
post #26

I feel like this article makes the same tired point I see every time a new technology comes alone: "but if we don't know how to shoe our own horses any more because we got cars, soon nobody will know how to shoe horses!" Yeah. And that's OK. Because nobody will need to shoe horses any more! If I forget how to write tests, what's the problem? It means that I never need to write tests any more. If I do need to write te…

> I forget how to write tests, what's the problem?

The day you will need troubleshoot one or simply understand it is the problem.

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#76
post #74

I can't shake the belief that the more one finds LLMs useful, the less valuable their work already is. Something that has no guarantee,not even a reassurance of being correct should not be trusted with any meaningful work

I need you to understand that software development with LLMs isnt about writing a prompt to spit out your entire app.

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#77

> And as a last point, I fear very much what’s going on in schools. My son is in school. And the teacher literally said they need to use an LLM otherwise they won’t score high enough because the other pupils are using LLMs and the teacher is using an LLM to grade/check it. This is ridiculous. And if you think that’s okay or you don’t see a serious problem with this, then that’s an even greater problem. If that is tru…

I attended one of best high schools in the area. One teacher, when I asked him what I can do about my failing grade, told me "you can go hang yourself". Why was I getting a failing grade in the first place? Well, it was normal that three quarters of the class would be failing his tests. That's just the kind of teacher he was. The PE teacher thought that his role was to teach us discipline based on fear. Later I heard…

This is so over the top that you might as well name and shame here to lend credibility to your story. What school in what "area" are you talking about?

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#78
post #26

I feel like this article makes the same tired point I see every time a new technology comes alone: "but if we don't know how to shoe our own horses any more because we got cars, soon nobody will know how to shoe horses!" Yeah. And that's OK. Because nobody will need to shoe horses any more! If I forget how to write tests, what's the problem? It means that I never need to write tests any more. If I do need to write te…

Critical thinking ability is not remotely akin to a mode of transport from a menu of alternatives.

> do I need them, or not?

Based on this comment of yours, the answer is a resounding yes, you do.

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#79
post #26

I feel like this article makes the same tired point I see every time a new technology comes alone: "but if we don't know how to shoe our own horses any more because we got cars, soon nobody will know how to shoe horses!" Yeah. And that's OK. Because nobody will need to shoe horses any more! If I forget how to write tests, what's the problem? It means that I never need to write tests any more. If I do need to write te…

Critical thinking ability is not remotely akin to a mode of transport from a menu of alternatives. > do I need them, or not? Based on this comment of yours, the answer is a resounding yes, you do.

Then they will never atrophy and we have no problem.

Re: Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

#80

> So am I saying don’t use LLMs? No, I’m not. I’m saying it needs serious guardrails, documentation, oversight, usage data, research, and it should definitely be banned from schools. Because it’s doing serious damage to young people’s ability to think, figure out, read, understand, and research. The original article didn't talk about any of these things.... > My son is in school. And the teacher literally said they n…

>The original article didn't talk about any of these things....

Indeed it didn't. That's why I did. :)

>Ah. The article's author heard a bad take on LLMs and accidentally attributed it to Ptacek's article.

Not at all. And if that's everything you took from this article, then I'm sorry for the loss of your time.

Post reply on HN