Live data from Hacker News

Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

kotaku.com

71–80 of 91 posts

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#71
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nintendo doesn't litigate if they believe the community project won't impact their sales/profits. For example, wii homebrew is not taken down by nintendo, even if there has been a recent "discovery" that the wii homebrew had relied on decompiled nintendo SDKs. Nintendo's litigious intention always has been profit driven (and this includes vaguely IP related issues, such as palworld's game mechanics - which i think is…

> and this includes vaguely IP related issues, such as palworld's game mechanics - which i think is frivilous but apparently not according to the courts Do you happen to have a link handy to an opinion document? It seems weird that Palworld’s “mechanics” would put them under fire but somehow development teams behind Tem Tem and Nexomon (and Cassette Beasts and Abomi Nation and ...) get away with selling games that ar…

Pokemon didn't invent that, it's an actual Japanese children's hobby. Although they do it with stag beetles. You can see the realistic version in Boku no Natsuyasumi.

A funny thing about Nintendo games I've always noticed is how completely disconnected the fans are from the people making it. Like, people argue about Zelda games' lore and timelines and such, but Nintendo cares about this so little that BotW and TotK have the same plot even though one is a direct sequel.

I'd guess that zero of those "Zelda T-shirt and cargo shorts" people work at Nintendo and that almost none of their employees have had video game-themed weddings. (Well, the US office is in Seattle so that one's definitely possible.)

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#72
post #59
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nintendo doesn't litigate if they believe the community project won't impact their sales/profits. For example, wii homebrew is not taken down by nintendo, even if there has been a recent "discovery" that the wii homebrew had relied on decompiled nintendo SDKs. Nintendo's litigious intention always has been profit driven (and this includes vaguely IP related issues, such as palworld's game mechanics - which i think is…

Nintendo sent cease and desists to streamed super smash Brothers melee tournaments during covid. Buncha free advertising to their IP by a group of their most passionate fans

Japanese companies don't like surprises or things they can't control, and often care about this more than money. They don't /want/ free advertising and have mixed feelings about passionate fans.

…Especially adult passionate fans of children's media.

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In fairness, Pokémon is perhaps the worst case in game design difficulty. You have an audience insisting on 3D characters and animations for 400+ (or however many now) Pokémon, each necessitating ~6 animations for unique attacks, 5+ status effects, idling/reaction animations, and ideally some trainer interaction. I understand why Nintendo has tried to use a lo-fi artstyle, make games with only subsets of the total be…

Honestly at this point they could go back to 151 and just do a good job filling them out and go from there. But all 3d games suffer from not being able to hand craft such a large 3d world but Pokémon is absolutely terrible at it. The Games look like they could have ran in the ps2 mid generation.

I personally loved how Scarlet/Violet was set in "Spain" but they were constantly giving up and just making it Japan. Like the school has a Japanese nurse's office and one of the bosses is an overworked salaryman.

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#74

Regardless, the remaster appears to have been rushed out due to increasing leaks, no? It's hard to believe that with the technical issues the release was actually intended to land in April 2025, instead of fixing issues until March 2026 and releasing it as an anniversary remaster.

I think the remaster may have been an experiment with Unreal Engine on top of Bethesda’s scripting / etc. I love Starfield, it is my favorite BGS game by a wide margin, but Creation Engine 2 is very difficult to work with - the Creation Kit is intolerably slow, I imagine BGS rank and file got very frustrated. Creation also lags with fancy lighting / fog effects, and might not ever support PS5[1], so I can see why Bet…

Anecdotally, playing Oblivion Remaster made me nostalgic for Creation. I have a beefy card and ample RAM, but it just runs like crap and I don't think it looks that much better than e.g. Starfield or Fallout 76

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And they are really letting their franchises go stale recently. Pokémon is especially bad.

Pokemon is it's own weird situation. It's not solely owned by Nintendo, but co-owned and managed with Game Freak and Creatures Inc by The Pokemon Company. It's not just a game but a media empire. They have to coordinate between the game, anime and TCG. It's not quite the same as Zelda or Mario where they have complete control and don't have to worry about messing with dozens of other product launches if the game need…

While Pokemon is owned by the Pokemon Company, the trademarks to all the Pokemon characters are owned by Nintendo.

https://www.pokemon.com/us/legal/information

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#76
post #48

People in the comments act like they have been to a family party and are now nitpicking every detail of the party, speculating that granddad might not let uncle celebrate their birthday next year, exclaiming that auntie had much better cake, and discussing the clip their niece posted to Facebook of the dirty basement. It's fine to be skeptical about the intentions of big family, but it's also fine to enjoy the cake o…

[deleted]

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#77
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nintendo doesn't litigate if they believe the community project won't impact their sales/profits. For example, wii homebrew is not taken down by nintendo, even if there has been a recent "discovery" that the wii homebrew had relied on decompiled nintendo SDKs. Nintendo's litigious intention always has been profit driven (and this includes vaguely IP related issues, such as palworld's game mechanics - which i think is…

> and this includes vaguely IP related issues, such as palworld's game mechanics - which i think is frivilous but apparently not according to the courts Do you happen to have a link handy to an opinion document? It seems weird that Palworld’s “mechanics” would put them under fire but somehow development teams behind Tem Tem and Nexomon (and Cassette Beasts and Abomi Nation and ...) get away with selling games that ar…

It's being claimed as a violation of their patent:

https://youtu.be/0PQUbotRkLE?t=254

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And they are really letting their franchises go stale recently. Pokémon is especially bad.

Pokemon is it's own weird situation. It's not solely owned by Nintendo, but co-owned and managed with Game Freak and Creatures Inc by The Pokemon Company. It's not just a game but a media empire. They have to coordinate between the game, anime and TCG. It's not quite the same as Zelda or Mario where they have complete control and don't have to worry about messing with dozens of other product launches if the game need…

>Pokemon is it's own weird situation.

Plus, there's that whole CIA thing.

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would only allow one level: all companies must be owned by a person or persons named. I would also have it that any contract controlling that person's interest is nullified so if you're trying to use a proxy to get around the law you'd have to be very sure you trust them because they are the legal owner.

Why do you want to ban social wealth funds? (Also, any form of equity investing that isn't a tax nightmare. You'd have to love doing K1s.)

Ah yeah, all the many social wealth funds that are owned by people without names. Such a loss!

I've no idea what a K1 is. Presumably something from your country. If the tax system in your country is so broken it can't cope with humans, you should probably fix it.

Re: Bethesda Thinks Fan Remaster of Oblivion Is 'Very Special' and Supports It

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you want to ban social wealth funds? (Also, any form of equity investing that isn't a tax nightmare. You'd have to love doing K1s.)

Ah yeah, all the many social wealth funds that are owned by people without names. Such a loss! I've no idea what a K1 is. Presumably something from your country. If the tax system in your country is so broken it can't cope with humans, you should probably fix it.

A social wealth fund owns companies and isn't a named person. So does any pension fund.
Post reply on HN