Live data from Hacker News

As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

voiceofsandiego.org

71–80 of 147 posts

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Giving out student aid for online classes is just ridiculous." This is also a sales pitch, playing to the far-right. (virtue signaling)

You think virtue signalling is playing to the far right? Care to define... any of your terms?

The fact you think the "libs" are the only ones who can virtue signal says a lot about you. The far-right have an entire playbook of dog whistles just for virtue signaling.

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#72
post #45

Isn't the solution really easy? Make the students show up on the first day in-person, compare.with ID and take a photo.

How do you handle students that are not capable of showing up on the first day in-person?

- Live far away

- Have a job they can't just not show up for

- Having children to take care of

- Health issues

There's tons of reasons for people not to be able to attend in person, and not all of them are "because I didn't want to". And, for a _lot_ of those people, improving their education can have a huge impact on their quality of life.

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#73

The author tried really hard to dance around the real problem here: California is apparently paying students to attend online community college. If attending these classes was even just free, this wouldn't be a problem. Giving out student aid for online classes is just ridiculous.

This is the hard part of society. We want nice things but propose anything that can be gamed/scammed for free money and it's instantly shot-down before it even gets off the ground. That, or if by a miracle it launches, is constantly attacked and smeared by politicians using it to get votes from selfish assholes who dont want to share (I learned about sharing in preschool and kindergarten).

Until you solve the primitive animalistic problems of selfishness, greed, and energy conserving laziness, were not going to have nice things. Someone asshole is going to be mad they have to share. Some asshole is going to lie and scam to get as much free shit as they can.

Solving this is a very hard problem.

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm mixed. If we lived in a utopian world where money isn't real, I'd agree. Reality is California has major budget issues. Offering the classes for free is already enough in the current climate. Working while going to school is not uncommon or isolated to California. Full time work while going to school is excessive - but that is also a California COL issue that the state needs to actually tackle. But it gets worse…

> Full time work while going to school is excessive ... For a healthy, driven person, without other major responsibilities (or a time-sucking internet addiction)? No, it really is not excessive. And that's assuming that "going to school" is also full time. Taking just one or two classes per term is an old tradition at community colleges.

> Taking just one or two classes per term is an old tradition at community colleges.

Not for people fresh out of high school. You are usually trying to graduate with a Bachelor's in 4 years so you do full-time at community college for 2 years to get your AA-T and then transfer to a university for your last 2 years. California in particular has a program that lets you transfer get a guaranteed transfer to any state university or participating private university once you get your AA-T.

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#75
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Giving student aid beyond just free classes enables students who would otherwise need to spend time working to support themselves to instead attend school to get a better life. Generally that's considered a good thing, not worthy of the disdain you're displaying.

You present hypothetical scenario of up against the reality they getting paid to “attend” online class is a total farce, diluting the value of a diploma or degree from that community college system well also stealing away resources.

This is your opinion and it is not a hypothetical scenario. Many people including myself received grant aid to attend classes both in person and virtual. If it wasn't for that flexibility I likely wouldn't have be able to go.

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The second order effects of cheap education are immense, ranging from longer life span, better health, stronger economies, amongst just a few. The matter at hand, specifically, is one about how our ability to verify is overwhelmed by our ability to generate content. This is playing out with recruitment, bug reports, complaint forms - and going all the way up to sophisticated fraud.

It's not cheap education. What is the point in deliberately changing the topic? It's about paying people to consume free education.

No. It's a Sybil attack on subsidy to help ppl of different means equally make room for education in their lives. No one is "making money" unless they are committing fraud. They are being put on an equal playing field -- the subsidies are seemingly directed at the individual, but are terraforming [of the field] in nature, not for enrichment of the individual.

I was able to get educated with full focus on that task, because my family prioritised saving for my education. I want others, without such privilege, to have access to such opportunity.

If you choose to frame it also that "your parents paid you to consume free education", then so be it. But let's not pretend the state is doing something strange or against its core mission here

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the first-order, emotional reaction, yes, but policy should be made based on its full effects, not just its sales pitch's popularity with first-order-emoting voters.

"Giving out student aid for online classes is just ridiculous." This is also a sales pitch, playing to the far-right. (virtue signaling)

Please avoid labels. It’s not unique to the ‘far’ right to want to manage accountability to limited resources like quality education. it’s generally accepted that requiring some level of skin in the game from those that benefit does a decent job of doing this.

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#78
post #31

This is an example of what I've been thinking about/warning about for several years now: we are entering a post-truth era, where there is increasingly no way to know what is real and what is not. When I've thought about it, this scenario never occurred to me, but it's a perfect example: we're going to be increasingly unable to know what is "true" in a million different ways, and people are going to exploit that in ev…

>no way to know

Wouldn't having class in person be a sure way to know?

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#79
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Very few students watch lectures online. There is massive amounts of cheating in online courses. Almost no online course requires proctored exams. Online education is overall worse, in terms of actual learning, than face-to-face courses.

But it's still better than no course option available to people that can't attend in person. So the question becomes how do we improve it.

The whole discussion revolves around credentialing and certification that you actually learned the stuff you claim to have learned, that you jumped through the hoops required by a given college system whose reputation you want to lever into a career.

If you just wanna learn stuff online, dive in and watch YouTube or any of the variety of online educstional services, but in reality you want a certification that says you did the work, and maybe the actual transfer of knowledge is secondary. We shouldn’t pretend that credentials should be handed out for watching YouTube videos and filling out tests with Google searches, group chats sharing answers, or now, AI.

The goal of any credentialing system shouldn’t be to lower the bar as low as possible; you just devalue the whole system. There are several major institutions, formerly reputable, that many will not hire job prospects from.

In other words… Community college should be a bit of a grind, one that produces students who are far more knowledgeable than when they started the program.

Re: As 'Bot' Students Continue to Flood In, Community Colleges Struggle to Respond

#80
post #45

Isn't the solution really easy? Make the students show up on the first day in-person, compare.with ID and take a photo.

How do you handle students that are not capable of showing up on the first day in-person? - Live far away - Have a job they can't just not show up for - Having children to take care of - Health issues There's tons of reasons for people not to be able to attend in person, and not all of them are "because I didn't want to". And, for a _lot_ of those people, improving their education can have a huge impact on their qual…

For special cases, the committee can come to you!
Post reply on HN