Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
71–80 of 123 posts
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#72Ugh. Then there's the general stupidity of forcing people to use E-mail addresses as user IDs. It's not just annoying, but also a security blunder. The general public can't be counted on to understand that when they're forced to use their E-mail address as an ID, they don't have to use their E-mail account's password for it. That makes every one of these sites a gatekeeper to the user's E-mail account. All it takes i…
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Related stupidity: "Security Questions" that enable someone to take over your account just by collecting not-so-secret information that is often shared because the site insists you pick from their own set of questions which other sites have already used.
The best way to tackle "Security Questions" is to generate a passphrase, store in your password manager, and use that for the answer. In the unlikely event you ever need to recover your account with the Security Answer, it's much easier to read out a few words than a 16+ character random password.
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#74Companies that allowed others to create accounts with my email addresses: PayPal, Apple, Credit Karma, Walmart (I just forwarded the email to legal@ and they took care of that instance very quickly, kudos to that at least). Edit: Forgot to add TD Bank - I actually opened a case with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency that regulates this bank. Companies that spammed me in the last 24 hours because they don'…
What email are you using that's so popular that dozens of people are (inadvertently?) entering it in all these businesses? Are you "john.smith@gmail.com" or something like that? I'm firstname@firstnamelastname.com, and I have had maybe a half dozen instances in the past decade.
Usually I takeover an account and change the password. Then add a 2FA if possible and update the details to my name and address. This way people can't say it's their account anymore.
A couple of times there were credit card numbers. I just delete those if possible.
I have cancelled hair appointments and car services. I have received flight information multiple times. I have locked out an account on a French dating site, which had some interesting exchanges (the guy's missing out!).
I did not cancel a vet appointment. Pets need to see a vet and their owners being dumb is not an excuse. I won't interfere with that. But I did book a full grooming for a week after.
When I takeover I just use a random password from Bitwarden and don't even bother saving the account, as I don't plan to ever use these again.
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aren't they the ones violating CFAA? They made an account for GP then accessed it without authorization.
People make mistakes.Just because someone made a mistake isn't permission to commit a crime against them.
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#76I agree that we would live in a better world if everyone on the internet followed standards and best practices, but we will never live in that world. We can expect the enshittification to get worse.
When this happens to me I make a filter to trash the emails. No amount of complaining or well-meaning (and in this case a bit self-promoting) articles will make the rest of the world change.
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
What email are you using that's so popular that dozens of people are (inadvertently?) entering it in all these businesses? Are you "john.smith@gmail.com" or something like that? I'm firstname@firstnamelastname.com, and I have had maybe a half dozen instances in the past decade.
I have a common lastnameinitial @ email provider. It's the same username from my mainframe days. Some people with similar surname use that, probably because they either don't want to receive emails or because they are just... I don't know, clueless? Usually I takeover an account and change the password. Then add a 2FA if possible and update the details to my name and address. This way people can't say it's their acco…
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
People make mistakes.Just because someone made a mistake isn't permission to commit a crime against them.
Accidentally signing up once is a mistake. One person signing up for products, credit cards, unemployment, medical bills, television services, payday loans, mortgages, jobs with my email address over a 6 year period isn’t a mistake. This is some middle age dude in middle America.
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#79Companies that allowed others to create accounts with my email addresses: PayPal, Apple, Credit Karma, Walmart (I just forwarded the email to legal@ and they took care of that instance very quickly, kudos to that at least). Edit: Forgot to add TD Bank - I actually opened a case with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency that regulates this bank. Companies that spammed me in the last 24 hours because they don'…
What email are you using that's so popular that dozens of people are (inadvertently?) entering it in all these businesses? Are you "john.smith@gmail.com" or something like that? I'm firstname@firstnamelastname.com, and I have had maybe a half dozen instances in the past decade.
Re: Not OK Cupid – A story of poor email address validation
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Accidentally signing up once is a mistake. One person signing up for products, credit cards, unemployment, medical bills, television services, payday loans, mortgages, jobs with my email address over a 6 year period isn’t a mistake. This is some middle age dude in middle America.
What gives you the confidence to say that it was a single individual and not just a common email name which lots of people accidentally used?
Oddly enough I’m still not sure of her correct address, only those of her correspondents. And in some cases family members.