I understand the sentiment that the Trump administration is draconian, especially for people traveling from abroad considering the new border policy. But, pardon me, how is that executive order about sex a "threat"? Listed as the top issue undermines the credibility of this petition I think.
It's a threat to transgender travellers; I know many in the tech industry. The U.S. is now denying entry visas to transgender travellers as well.
Boycott IETF 127
71–80 of 412 posts
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#72Re: Boycott IETF 127
#73[flagged]
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a threat to transgender travellers; I know many in the tech industry. The U.S. is now denying entry visas to transgender travellers as well.
[flagged]
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a historical context “wellness farms” is understood as a euphemism for concentration camp. It’s free but you can’t leave.
If you talk to a parent of a child who OD'd, most commonly of fent these days, they all have this thought. What if I took them somewhere remote where there are no drugs and didn't let them leave? My heart hurts for them, but I have no idea if it's a good idea or not. Regardless, I think his heart is in the right place. Time will tell whether or not it's actually useful.
But they don't, they outsource the job to a group of (mostly) sadistic, uneducated-in-rehab, "boot camps" that somehow think that violently invading an individual's rights and actions is how to "cure" drug addiction, without attempting to treat the underlying causes of addictive behavior.
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
In what historical context was “wellness farm” used as a euphemism?
would you, in the context of fascist Germany or other totalitarian regimes with concentration camps, not understand the quoted text as cynical euphemism for such camps? this understanding of metaphors is not that it was used then. the understanding happens today a contemporary application of historical knowledge. and honestly, it's obvious.
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#77[flagged]
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#78Is this a parody? > Beyond problems at the border, the current Secretary for Health and Human Services - Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - has said that he will send those with ADHD to camps. Source: Futurism. What he actually said: > "I’m going to dedicate that revenue to creating wellness farms — drug rehabilitation farms, in rural areas all over this country," he said during the podcast. "I’m going to make it so people can…
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#79Regardless of your take on this, it's very interesting to see the UI components they're using. These look identical to the gov.uk system, but I wasn't aware of it being available for use outside of their government websites.
(Apart from the GDS Transport font, which is exclusive to GOV.UK websites)
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#80I heard last night from my friend who works in astronomy that they decided to cancel their event in the US and let the US attendees travel to Europe instead. I can’t get used to the fact that the US seems dead set on destroying its reputation in the world. But with the direction the comment section of HN has taken over the last few years I’m sure there will be lots of commenters who will dismiss this as virtue signal…
It is real. It is interesting, because I don't think US wars or international interference over the years have caused this effect but now people are avoiding the US for pure "look out for number 1" reasons. I.e. it isn't safe enough for them to enter and it ain't worth the risk for some conference, holiday or work thing.
The targets usually have darker skin or are from countries far more east, but now it affects people like themselves.