Live data from Hacker News

Boycott IETF 127

boycott-ietf127.org

71–80 of 412 posts

Re: Boycott IETF 127

#71
post #20

I understand the sentiment that the Trump administration is draconian, especially for people traveling from abroad considering the new border policy. But, pardon me, how is that executive order about sex a "threat"? Listed as the top issue undermines the credibility of this petition I think.

It's a threat to transgender travellers; I know many in the tech industry. The U.S. is now denying entry visas to transgender travellers as well.

[flagged]

Re: Boycott IETF 127

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a threat to transgender travellers; I know many in the tech industry. The U.S. is now denying entry visas to transgender travellers as well.

[flagged]

Well, reality is more complex then this. It misses intersex as a biological option. Not common, but still, it is not in there, but reality for some humans.

Re: Boycott IETF 127

#75
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In a historical context “wellness farms” is understood as a euphemism for concentration camp. It’s free but you can’t leave.

If you talk to a parent of a child who OD'd, most commonly of fent these days, they all have this thought. What if I took them somewhere remote where there are no drugs and didn't let them leave? My heart hurts for them, but I have no idea if it's a good idea or not. Regardless, I think his heart is in the right place. Time will tell whether or not it's actually useful.

If the parents went with the child, and stayed with them, then maybe.

But they don't, they outsource the job to a group of (mostly) sadistic, uneducated-in-rehab, "boot camps" that somehow think that violently invading an individual's rights and actions is how to "cure" drug addiction, without attempting to treat the underlying causes of addictive behavior.

Re: Boycott IETF 127

#76
post #51
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In what historical context was “wellness farm” used as a euphemism?

would you, in the context of fascist Germany or other totalitarian regimes with concentration camps, not understand the quoted text as cynical euphemism for such camps? this understanding of metaphors is not that it was used then. the understanding happens today a contemporary application of historical knowledge. and honestly, it's obvious.

Oh so you mean it wasn’t used that way in a historical context? Got it.

Re: Boycott IETF 127

#78

Is this a parody? > Beyond problems at the border, the current Secretary for Health and Human Services - Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - has said that he will send those with ADHD to camps. Source: Futurism. What he actually said: > "I’m going to dedicate that revenue to creating wellness farms — drug rehabilitation farms, in rural areas all over this country," he said during the podcast. "I’m going to make it so people can…

I like that you scrolled past the relevant paragraph here and then quoted a different thing that he said as proof that the paragraph that you ignored didn’t exist. I’m curious as to why you would bother including a real quote from the article? If your starting point for crafting a post is “Nobody will read the article I’m talking about” the sky is the limit, you could say he said anything you like.

Re: Boycott IETF 127

#79

Regardless of your take on this, it's very interesting to see the UI components they're using. These look identical to the gov.uk system, but I wasn't aware of it being available for use outside of their government websites.

It is open source, yeah: https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-frontend

(Apart from the GDS Transport font, which is exclusive to GOV.UK websites)

Re: Boycott IETF 127

#80
post #22

I heard last night from my friend who works in astronomy that they decided to cancel their event in the US and let the US attendees travel to Europe instead. I can’t get used to the fact that the US seems dead set on destroying its reputation in the world. But with the direction the comment section of HN has taken over the last few years I’m sure there will be lots of commenters who will dismiss this as virtue signal…

It is real. It is interesting, because I don't think US wars or international interference over the years have caused this effect but now people are avoiding the US for pure "look out for number 1" reasons. I.e. it isn't safe enough for them to enter and it ain't worth the risk for some conference, holiday or work thing.

Because the wars didn‘t affect white people or people of certain countries

The targets usually have darker skin or are from countries far more east, but now it affects people like themselves.

Post reply on HN