Live data from Hacker News

About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

github.com

71–80 of 179 posts

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#71
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO it's only a matter of time before LLMs will include ads. Current pricing isn't covering the costs of running LLMs and brands will pay a high price for being favored in responses.

But how such adverts would look like?

Sure, here is your answer: ...

... By the way, have you heard about Squarespace?

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#72
post #18

I tried uBlock Origin Lite for a very short time. Then I realized that in Lite, the user can’t add custom rules[0]. That’s when I had enough. So now I’m using Firefox instead, where I can use uBlock Origin. [0] See https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1in2ls4/ubloc...

I simply cannot give up the option of zapping distractions off of my screen. I really cannot understand how people can use Youtube or even a Youtube embedded video without zapping away the distractions. There is no way I'm coming back to Chrome if they don't support manifest V2. It's Firefox for me.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#74
What is the best way to migrate retaining as much as possible to a fork, like Brave or Iridium, or whatever is probably the best privacy based one with an emphasis on retaining Manifest V2/ ublock support?

Already migrated my Firefox to Librewolf, just need to find something for Chrome, as I don't really follow the scene close.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#75
post #66

Google is milking a dying cow. LLMs are much better in searching for information than advertisement-exposure optimized google. People are paying for LLMs, consumers are no longer a commodity. Internet will change, maybe creators will be paid for their content? But what will happen with advertisers?

> LLMs are much better in searching for information than advertisement-exposure optimized google. Completely disagree. Just this morning I've been trying to search for how to pair a wireless headset that I own to a new receiver. Gemini tells me there is no need to pair the adapter, but if I do need to do it I should press . It also pushes the PDF and TS articles that the manufacturer provides off of my main search wi…

They're better at it if you don't actually care about the truth of the result though.

I.e confirming your opinion, compiling a report about something you're not gonna take action on etc

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#76
post #48

Google is milking a dying cow. LLMs are much better in searching for information than advertisement-exposure optimized google. People are paying for LLMs, consumers are no longer a commodity. Internet will change, maybe creators will be paid for their content? But what will happen with advertisers?

IMO it's only a matter of time before LLMs will include ads. Current pricing isn't covering the costs of running LLMs and brands will pay a high price for being favored in responses.

Perplexity has occasional ads. They're unintrusive and clearly marked the way Google's ads started out.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#79
post #56
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They mention "other browsers" in addition to Firefox that will continue to support Manifest v2, but I can't find a list. Does anyone know off-hand the additional browser options for Manifest V2 and multiple-OS support?

I think some Chromium-based browsers like Brave have pledged that they'll keep v2 around for as long as it's practical? Though IMO, people who depend on Manifest v2 with Chromium forks are running on borrowed time, Chromium moves fast and I can't imagine that keeping the Manifest v2 code working will be very easy. Especially if Google takes advantage of the limited access extensions now have to the HTTP request flow…

Yep, currently brave (and others I assume) switch it on at build time, when Google removes that from chromium they may move it to their patch set, but who knows how long they’ll keep that once it starts breaking.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#80
post #40
post #18

I tried uBlock Origin Lite for a very short time. Then I realized that in Lite, the user can’t add custom rules[0]. That’s when I had enough. So now I’m using Firefox instead, where I can use uBlock Origin. [0] See https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1in2ls4/ubloc...

It’s only a matter of time before the modern Phoebus cartel starts blocking Firefox.

We were seen as failing a security audit recently for having firefox installed on some of the development laptops and got ordered to remove it by IT who conceeded that it was stupid but had to check boxes for insurance is ISO standards.

This causes the majority of people to only be exposed to Edge/IE or Chrome at work, and use their phones the rest of the time.

Post reply on HN