Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Test

defense.gov

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

71–80 of 156 posts

Re: Test

#71

Post by Jimmc414 »

niemandhier wrote: post #39
floathub wrote: post #5

They are testing the: asfasfasdfasfdasdfasfasfasfsadffffffffffffffffffffasdfsfsafsfdwfgasdgbdfbgdsgasdgdsbdb defense system (the pentagon is a really big building).

Advanced Strategic Framework for Allied Security and Force Alignment, Surveillance, Defense, Forward Asset Stabilization, Force Deployment, Aero-Space Defensive Frontlines, Allied Support, Forward Assault, Special Forces, Aerial Synchronization, Fusion, Assurance, Safeguards, Frontline Security, Superior Applied Deterrence, Flexible Forward Formations Facilitating Fused Fronts For Future Functionality, Aligning Strat…

Is that the name of an Arduril Java bean?

Re: Test

#72

Post by FergusArgyll »

good use for new gemini flash 2.0

Always Suspect False Alarm Signals For Advanced Spies, Deliberately Altering Subconscious Functions, And Systematically Filtering Society Across Different Frequencies For Further Fragmentation Following Foreordained Frames, Finally Arriving Starting Fast Sequences And Formulating Strategic Directions With Forceful Generated Actions Subverting Defenses Globally By Designed Function Based Gradual Deception Sequentially Gradually Spreading Detrimental Binary

We may already be too late

Re: Test

#73

Post by coffeeisyummy »

I'm smiling because I let my baby daughter play with my computer and type random gibberish for a while, then created a "blog" of her work.

This has the same vibe.

Re: Test

#76

Post by bitlax »

ericcumbee wrote: post #14

Anyone thats managed a website before has probably done that test post and forgot to delete it after the fact.

Yeah I don't really see what's noteworthy about this.

Re: Test

#77

Post by benj111 »

cushychicken wrote: post #45
Tiberium wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What model did you use for this?

Definitely a good use of AI.

Wheres the fun in that?

Acronyms need to be hand crafted.

Anyway, AI can't even give itself a good acronym.

It should be 'Machine Intelligence and Neuro Datagrams' or something.

Re: Test

#79

Post by benj111 »

gostsamo wrote: post #26

I'm more worried by this: > Subscribe to Defense.gov Products > Choose which Defense.gov products you want delivered to your inbox. Quite sure that they can hit my mailbox from there with many of their products.

Yes. 'products' in the context of the DoD isn't the kind of thing they should be offering to Civvys. Or foreign nationals in my case.
Post reply on HN