Live data from Hacker News

GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

bloomberg.com

71–80 of 742 posts

Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

#71
post #28

Github was an early OpenAI design partner. OpenAI developed a custom LLM for them. It's so interesting that even after that early mover advantage they have to go back to the foundation model providers. Does this mean that future tech companies have no choice but to do this?

Yes, because transfer learning works. A specialized model for X will be subsumed by a general model for X/Y/Z as it becomes better at Y/Z. This is why models which learn other languages become better at English.

Custom models still have use cases, e.g. situations requiring cheaper or faster inference. But ultimately The Bitter Lesson holds -- your specialized thing will always be overtaken by throwing more compute at a general thing. We'll be following around foundation models for the foreseeable future, with distilled offshoots bubbling up/dying along the way.

Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

#73
post #58
post #32

If you want to destroy open source completely, the more models the better. Microsoft's co-opting and infiltration of OSS projects will serve as a textbook example of eliminating competition in MBA programs. And people still support it by uploading to GitHub.

> If you want to destroy open source completely The irony is of course that open source is what they used to train their models with.

That was the point. They are laundering IP. It's the long way around the GPL, allowing then to steal.

Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

#75
post #3

This is pretty exciting. I'm a copilot user at work, but also have access to Claude. I'm more inclined to use Claude for difficult coding problems or to review my work as I've just grown more confident in its abilities over the last several months.

The speed with which AI models are improving blows my mind. Humans quickly normalize technological progress, but it's staggering to reflect on our progress over just these two years .

Yes! I'm much more inclined to write one-off scripts for short manual tasks as I can usually get AI to get something useful very fast. For example, last week I worked with Claude to write a script to get a sense of how many PRs my company had that included comprehensive testing. This was borderline best done as a manual task previously, now I just ask Claude to write a short bash script that uses the GitHub CLI to do it and I've got a repeatable reliable process for pulling this information.

Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

#76
post #7

Great news! This can only mean better suggestions. I expected little from Copilot, but now i find it indispensible. It is such a productivity multiplier.

I removed it from windows and I'm still very productive. Probably moreso, since I don't have to make constant corrections. To each their own.

GitHub Copilot and Microsoft Copilot are different products

Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

#79
post #55
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, Claude consistently impresses me. A commenter on another thread mentioned it but it’s very similar to how search felt in the early 2000s. I ask it a question and get my answer. Sometimes it’s a little (or a lot) wrong or outdated, but at least I get something to tinker with.

Conversely I feel that the experience of searching has been degraded by a lot since 2016/17. My these is that, at this time, online spam increased by an order of magnitude

Winning the war against spam is an arms race. Spam hasn’t spent years targeting AI search yet.

Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

#80
post #3

This is pretty exciting. I'm a copilot user at work, but also have access to Claude. I'm more inclined to use Claude for difficult coding problems or to review my work as I've just grown more confident in its abilities over the last several months.

I use both Claude and ChatGPT/GPT-4o a lot. Claude, the model, definitely is 'better' than GPT-4o. But OpenAI provides a much more capable app in ChatGPT and an easier development platform.

I would absolutely choose to use Claude as my model with ChatGPT if that happened (yes, I know it won't). ChatGPT as an app is just so far ahead: code interpreter, web search/fetch, fluid voice interaction, Custom GPTs, image generation, and memory. It isn't close. But Claude absolutely produces better code, only being beaten by ChatGPT because it can fetch data from the web to RAG enhance its knowledge of things like APIs.

Claude's implementation of artifacts is very good though, and I'm sure that is what lead OpenAI to push out their buggy canvas feature.

Post reply on HN