Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you mean: Brendan Eich, the creator of JavaScript and a co-signatory of this letter, wrote in 2006 that “ECMAScript was always an unwanted trade name that sounds like a skin disease.” Then this is not a matter of trademark or identity. It is only a matter of marketing. If this is just a matter of trademark my comment remains equally valid. Just use a different name.
"Why should I change? He's the one who sucks." Oracle gets no real benefit from the trademark, and getting everyone to stop calling it JavaScript is basically impossible. It would be better for everyone for Oracle to just abandon the trademark. I don't expect Oracle to actively release the trademark, but it would be better if they did.
Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
71–80 of 135 posts
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#72Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Regardless, JavaScript is now much larger than Java Curious, but in what way? Java still drive lots of enterprise and banks, and I cant' say I've seen any Node.js in the backend at any of these places.
JavaScript is the world's most popular programming language. https://www.statista.com/statistics/793628/worldwide-develop...
I also wonder how they count multi users, I can easily mark 10 of those if not more.
> HTML/CSS were the most commonly used programming languages
I am sorry but that can't be taken seriously, then I know a ton of Excel developers, and wait till I get to Powerpoint ones.
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#74i don't think oracle does anything in order to earn goodwill or because it's the right thing. they're structurally immune to moral suasion. don't forget that oracle was the company that sued google for the independent reimplementation of java they used in android. if you want oracle to do something, you either need to offer them a lot of money or level an extremely credible, well-financed legal threat at them as agum…
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#75This is a stupid non-issue. You can go ahead and call it JavaScript despite what Oracle does or doesn't say. Better yet, though: don't call it JavaScript—call it JS. "JavaScript" is and always was a dumb name. "JS" is not only fine, but better—and not because "JS" is particularly good, but because "JavaScript" itself isn't exactly hard to beat. The only thing left to do is for the spec authors (which includes signato…
There is nothing better about "JS" over "JavaScript".
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#76People falling in the ages old trap of antropormophizing Oracle executives.
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#77i don't think oracle does anything in order to earn goodwill or because it's the right thing. they're structurally immune to moral suasion. don't forget that oracle was the company that sued google for the independent reimplementation of java they used in android. if you want oracle to do something, you either need to offer them a lot of money or level an extremely credible, well-financed legal threat at them as agum…
EUIPO "[Iceland Supermarket] cannot reasonably trademark the name of a country that has been around since the 9th century".
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#78Does Oracle actually defend it? Isn't the rule behind a trademark that you actually need to enforce it? VELCRO(r) has this song about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRi8LptvFZY Edit: as I watched the video again I finally caught on the fact that RollerBlades are a brand of inline-skates. In Belgium we called them inline-skates. It's interesting to see how brands-as-identifiers change based on language and countr…
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#79People falling in the ages old trap of antropormophizing Oracle executives.
Re: Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript
#80People falling in the ages old trap of antropormophizing Oracle executives.
Have you seen Larry lately? How do you look like that at 80 years old? He must be a cyborg.