Live data from Hacker News

FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

ic3.gov

71–80 of 238 posts

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#71

What's the current status of whole-network blockers that use DNS? I tried pihole maybe 8 years ago, and it just broke too many websites for me to leave it on for my wife. It really frustrated her.

I don't use it personally but know several people that do. It has different levels of blocking, and so if you have the patience, you can go full block mode and gradually peel back the blocking to sites that you want to use. My friends thoroughly recommend it.

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#72

Adblock would break most websites nowadays. It's commonplace to detect adblock and disable the website if adblock is detected.

I have uBO, a pihole, and noscript between me and the web nowadays. I'd say I run into a website that intentionally bricks itself once every 3-6 months.

It's an uncommon practice in my experience, and it's easy to understand why. 90+% of websites nowadays are click farms - their content is totally interchangeable with, if not plagiarized from, hundreds of other sites. The one site that implements an anti-adblocker measure simply gives up a portion of its traffic to another site that doesn't. The far more lucrative strategy is to try to subvert the ad blocker, which many sites actually do.

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#73

It's always an insane experience when you hop on someone's laptop/PC who has zero ad blocking installed. POV: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/iV3js9pd5IE

I've been using Safari on occasion for the past year because it starts up faster. I was too lazy to figure out how to install an ad blocker there and the strangest thing happened. I saw an ad many months later and realized I couldn't remember seeing a single one until that point. I suppose it's because I've become so good at avoiding the types of websites that have ads that maybe I don't even need an ad blocker (I'm extremely opposed to seeing ads that aren't SuperBowl ads). There also aren't that many website I visit. I use GitHub. I watch Netflix and Amazon where I can pay extra to not see ads. I also pay for YouTube Red. I use Kagi which is another place I can pay to not see ads. I also read Hacker News, where I'm always super careful to check that the domain on a link looks like a real person's website (i.e. isn't something like nytimes) before clicking.

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#75

We still haven’t reached peak Idiocracy. YouTube/hulu/disney+ still cut to ads instead of displaying them around the border of the content. Carl’s Jr/Brawndo still haven’t purchased the FCC. We are pretty close though.

Too easy to block adverts around the border with cardboard.

They still need to make people actually think that adverts are good

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#76
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

In addition to the threat to children, there's also terrorism to consider. It is frightening to consider that the World Trade Center towers might still be standing were it not for ordinary users who foolishly assumed that nothing really bad could happen if they installed adblock.

When I have a time to unwind and think less sensible thoughts, I can't help but wonder whether anti-fossil fuels movement would try to capitalize on 9/11 if it happened today and not in 2001 by trying to ban use of planes due to amount of fuel used.

"Terrorists use planes. You are not a terrorist, are you?"

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#77
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just go to ublock origin on firefox and install it, they'll never ask about it; i'm just doing them a solid.

Given the numbers of times I've had to disable ad blocker to fix some janky page I have to use, I don't think installing an ad blocker without explaining or even mentioning it is a friendly act.

I don't think it happened to me, but then I don't venture outside Amazon, Newegg.. major sites that much. But even then.. if they need all those crazy redirects, maybe they don't want my business.

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#78

We still haven’t reached peak Idiocracy. YouTube/hulu/disney+ still cut to ads instead of displaying them around the border of the content. Carl’s Jr/Brawndo still haven’t purchased the FCC. We are pretty close though.

Honestly, we are there. It just didn't make the news yet for some unknown reason.

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#79

It's always an insane experience when you hop on someone's laptop/PC who has zero ad blocking installed. POV: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/iV3js9pd5IE

It's no wonder people have gotten a lot more ignorant and less observant when they have to constantly fight the bombardment of their attention by unwanted distractions. In that situation of using someone else's device, I've had to move windows half off the screen to be able to concentrate on an article when the ads on the side were constantly distracting me.

Funny how here's HN, a site full of Software Engineers complaining about ad bombardment, and every single one of those ads were programmed by... a software engineer! We (as a profession) are the ones doing this! "Oh, but boss told me to do it!" some will say, as if it's a good excuse. Regardless of which manager told which developer to do it, at the end of the day, a developer typed in the code and pushed it to prod. We're at least partially to blame for what the web has become.

Re: FBI recommends using an ad blocker (2022)

#80

It's always an insane experience when you hop on someone's laptop/PC who has zero ad blocking installed. POV: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/iV3js9pd5IE

It's no wonder people have gotten a lot more ignorant and less observant when they have to constantly fight the bombardment of their attention by unwanted distractions. In that situation of using someone else's device, I've had to move windows half off the screen to be able to concentrate on an article when the ads on the side were constantly distracting me.

Ads teach to not pay attention.
Post reply on HN