Live data from Hacker News

New gTLD Applied-For Strings

newgtlds.icann.org

71–80 of 178 posts

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#71
Since the very beginning this entire concept has seemed horribly misguided. I get that we need to expand the range of possible domain names but is this really the way to do it?

It seems like 1 part extortion, 1 part destruction of a free internet, and 1 part orchestrated gold rush for squatters.

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#72
A great way to squeeze the last dollars out of domains, now that all are squatted.

The application fees were $5k registration + $185k or $47k evaluation, so they collected something between $100 million and $366 million dollars, annual fees excluded.

I can see two possible outcomes:

1. all conflicts are resolved by agreements/bidding, process goes smoothly. But usage nevers picks up, and in a years'time it's all money down the drain.

2. ICANN backpedals and decides to cancel this stupid idea, while deciding to (legally) keep the application fees. Fighting ensues and we get a new, better management organization. Or worse.

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#73
post #48

What happens when several companies want the same one? There's a whole bunch of companies going for .app, so who gets which domains?

I want to know how a doughnut company could get .world

It's not a doughnut company, it's a VC-founded internet startup!

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#74
post #3

Google wants: .ads, .and, .android, .app, .are, .baby, .blog, .boo, .book, .buy, .cal, .car (no .cdr?), .channel, .chrome, .cloud, .corp (great way to snoop on poorly configured intranets), .cpa, .dad, .day, .dclk, .dds (New: Google Dentist!), .dev, .diy, .docs, .dog, .dot, .drive, .earth, .eat, .esq, .est, .family, .film, .fly, .foo, .free, .fun, .fyi, .game, .gbiz, .gle, .gmail, .gmbh (really?), .goo, .goog, .googl…

"Guge" is apparently the name by which "Google wants to be known in China."[1]

[1]: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/04/guge.html

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#75
post #26

I'm curious why some of those rows are colored blue (IDN, KIDS, UMMAH). I also wonder what effect this will have on domain squatting (probably very little, all told). Anyone have any favorites? I see .DOT (dot.dot, anyone?), .WINNERS, .SUCKS (more desirable than .SEX), .NINJA, .MATRIX (registered by L'Oreal rather than HP, sadly), .IRA (financial planning and domestic terrorism in one convenient location), and absolu…

I'm surprised the US government didn't go for .dot, as in Department of Transportation. You could replace www.michigan.gov/mdot with mi.dot.

.dot would be funny, imagine telling people to go to dot.dot or even slashdot.dot

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#76

What happens when several companies want the same one? There's a whole bunch of companies going for .app, so who gets which domains?

See section "1.1.2.10 String Contention" of the applicant guidebook. In the guidebook it ultimately may come down to "community resolution" or auctioning.

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#77

Yeesh...in case there was any doubt beforehand that this is a terrible idea, the initial list is now proof. They have taken something that has a valid technical reason to exist and turned it into a cesspool. Hopefully those in control of infrastructure take a stand and simply reject these "domains" entirely. Shouldn't be hard to set up sanity-restoring filters...let us please just pretend these are spam domains and n…

> this will do nothing to improve the size of the name space

It opens new options for "local" addresses: biketour.berlin biketour.paris antics.london etc

wether this will stick is another story.

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#78
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

.localdomain would be better.

Also .local "Despite not being a valid top-level domain in the Internet, considerable DNS traffic that queries the local domain exists in the public Domain Name System.[1] In June 2009, the L root server received more than 400 such queries per second,[2] ranking 4th in DNS traffic of all TLDs after COM, ARPA, and NET." [1] Scary potential for mischief-making. Hopefully ICANN would reject applications for these domain…

.local is already spelled out as a reserved word in the application guidebook.

Re: New gTLD Applied-For Strings

#80
post #74
post #3

Google wants: .ads, .and, .android, .app, .are, .baby, .blog, .boo, .book, .buy, .cal, .car (no .cdr?), .channel, .chrome, .cloud, .corp (great way to snoop on poorly configured intranets), .cpa, .dad, .day, .dclk, .dds (New: Google Dentist!), .dev, .diy, .docs, .dog, .dot, .drive, .earth, .eat, .esq, .est, .family, .film, .fly, .foo, .free, .fun, .fyi, .game, .gbiz, .gle, .gmail, .gmbh (really?), .goo, .goog, .googl…

"Guge" is apparently the name by which "Google wants to be known in China."[1] [1]: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/04/guge.html

More specifically, "Gǔgē" is the Pinyin rendering of "谷歌", Google's name in hanzi. The characters literally mean "valley song".
Post reply on HN