Live data from Hacker News

Apollo DN10000: Quad CPU/128Mb RAM workstation from 1988 [pdf]

jim.rees.org

71–80 of 163 posts

Re: Apollo DN10000: Quad CPU/128Mb RAM workstation from 1988 [pdf]

#71
I worked at LTX as my first job out of college, and they were re-architecting their test systems based on the Apollo 68K based DN systems. Domain/OS was weird and even those expensive boxes still had trace wires soldered on the motherboards.

A few years later, I ended up at the DEC GEM compiler project but by then the Alpha code generator / optimizer were fairly developed already.

Then I went to HP and worked on the PA-WW --> Itanium code generator.

Good times.

Re: Apollo DN10000: Quad CPU/128Mb RAM workstation from 1988 [pdf]

#72
post #2

Even 10-15 years later, multiple CPUs and 128Mb RAM was quite uncommon. How much did this beast cost back in the 80s? Edit: Max configs were up to $250,000 ($663,937.02 today) back then according to this price list: http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/apollo/Apollo_Price_List_Jul88....

I'm triggered every time I see things like "$663,937.02 today". I just can't help it. There should be a word for [mindlessly] reporting the results of a calculation to arbitrary precision when only one significant digit of precision is warranted. There probably is such a word in German.

Extremzufallsgenauigkeitsangabe?

Re: Apollo DN10000: Quad CPU/128Mb RAM workstation from 1988 [pdf]

#73
Our science/electronics lab was given a bunch of Apollo workstations around 1990. Used for schematic capture and SPICE simulation. They were very powerful but one thing I most clearly remember was the absolutely weird graphical user interface they used, quite unlike anything before or since (and not in a good way). Does anyone remember what that was called?

Edit: Domain/OS! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain/OS

Re: Apollo DN10000: Quad CPU/128Mb RAM workstation from 1988 [pdf]

#76

I love reading this stuff! Love seeing the fiber optics stuff at the end, every era had their own buzzwords with cool pictures! The only thing I don't like is the inside of the case, it reminds me of some dell or HP systems, densely packed stuff with lots of metal brackets that's hard to work with and probably "vacuum cleaner" style fans in it too (I don't see the fans in the fotos, but I just feel it from the looks…

They seem to have put some effort into thermal design and claim a noise level (at 30°C) of 55dB, which fits into an office.

Re: Apollo DN10000: Quad CPU/128Mb RAM workstation from 1988 [pdf]

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm triggered every time I see things like "$663,937.02 today". I just can't help it. There should be a word for [mindlessly] reporting the results of a calculation to arbitrary precision when only one significant digit of precision is warranted. There probably is such a word in German.

Überpräzisionsberichterstattung

Would be possible but seems overcomplicated. Why not just "Überpräzisierung"? This is actually in use.

Re: Apollo DN10000: Quad CPU/128Mb RAM workstation from 1988 [pdf]

#78
post #2

Even 10-15 years later, multiple CPUs and 128Mb RAM was quite uncommon. How much did this beast cost back in the 80s? Edit: Max configs were up to $250,000 ($663,937.02 today) back then according to this price list: http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/apollo/Apollo_Price_List_Jul88....

I'm triggered every time I see things like "$663,937.02 today". I just can't help it. There should be a word for [mindlessly] reporting the results of a calculation to arbitrary precision when only one significant digit of precision is warranted. There probably is such a word in German.

Schadenfreude
Post reply on HN