Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft cutting crucial link to Gaza, Palestinians say

bbc.com

71–80 of 230 posts

Re: Microsoft cutting crucial link to Gaza, Palestinians say

#72
post #49

These companies want to become as ubiquitous as a public utility. Therefore they should be regulated like a public utility

I don't think that would help in this case: being regulated as a US public utility would still embargo Gaza and treat contact with it as radioactive.

I'm not sure that's true for what they would be regulated under: common carrier rules.

Case in point: gaza's area code isn't banned by us pots operators.

Re: Microsoft cutting crucial link to Gaza, Palestinians say

#73
post #3

This is why I have my own domain and control the MX records on the DNS on it, so that I can reroute email to a new email provider, if needed (I pay for Fastmail). Another nice thing about having a catch-all on own domain is that you can sign up to each service with a unique email address, e.g. @ , which makes it easy to see if any services ever sold your address.

You can even put @ . Let’s note however that even "owning a domain" is an illusion of control, as IANA is ultimately a retainer of uncle Sam. I don’t know if there is any functional distributed alternative that promote more autonomy to end users that can works out of the box (or even just a few basic install steps away) in most digital terminal out there.

Didn’t the US give up direct control of IANA years ago?

Re: Microsoft cutting crucial link to Gaza, Palestinians say

#74

Some people forget that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

Typical sentence of people that are guilty, just like those who pretend they should be able to hide information outside of the protective gaze of the glorious all-powerful elites who know better than thouh.

What are you trying to hide, you seditious terrorist, hmm?

Re: Microsoft cutting crucial link to Gaza, Palestinians say

#75
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Digital Markets Act and/or Digital Services Act ought to have something to say about this, especially the "this secret decision is final and we refuse to say anything else" part of the story.

That wording sounds like the decision was made in Israel and not the US. I would guess the shutdown requests came from Israeli security services. Thus it is final and not appealable and can also the reasoning can not be revealed.

However, if they've adversely affected an EU resident or even worse an EU national, the DMA forces them to allow an appeal and recourse.

Re: Microsoft cutting crucial link to Gaza, Palestinians say

#77
post #47
post #3

This is why I have my own domain and control the MX records on the DNS on it, so that I can reroute email to a new email provider, if needed (I pay for Fastmail). Another nice thing about having a catch-all on own domain is that you can sign up to each service with a unique email address, e.g. @ , which makes it easy to see if any services ever sold your address.

> you can sign up to each service with a unique email address, e.g. @ , which makes it easy to see if any services ever sold your address. Pro tip on this, use gibberish if you want a true canary. I know it's tempting to use microsoft@ or ms@ or msft@ etc, but companies are getting smarter about selling emails and filter those out.

Anecdotally backing this up, I did the less obfuscated address with Tractor Supply and they flagged my account as fraud and nullified a gift card that a company gave me. I tried working with their customer support but they were openly joking with one another on the calls treating me as a scammer.

Re: Microsoft cutting crucial link to Gaza, Palestinians say

#80
US gov tells companies that xyz groups are under sanctions (which is good, actually) and that they must put effort into preventing them from using their products (also good, actually). The problem is that they are punished for true negatives (in the press and potentially by the gov) but not for false positives (except for articles like this). The end result is overzealous bullshit that ends up hurting innocent people. For another example, the US gov told Paypal that they need to prevent transactions related to a weapon smuggling shell company "Tarigrade Limited" (which as I've said before, is good actually) but they implemented it to just block transactions and freeze accounts if "Tarigrade" is in the notes. Similarly, I know of a small store that sells patches that got their account frozen for some time because they released a patch with a firearm in it and had the gall to put the name of the firearm in the name of the product.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7wg3w/paypal-tardigrade-err...

Post reply on HN