Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Lindroid

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

71–80 of 94 posts

Re: Lindroid

#71

Post by antifa »

figmert wrote: post #8

I'm currently in the process of trying to see if Samsung DeX is able to replace my laptop. It is running directly on Termux, as opposed to using something like proot. So far it seems promising, and the biggest thing issue I have is that the Termux-X11 session essentially acts like a VM in that shortcuts are not seemless. I'd love to know how this compares to that. Or maybe there's a way to make that more seemless. E.…

I'm annoyed that Firefox for android doesn't have hot keys at all and chrome for android is also missing enough hotkeys/mouse behaviors that I'll usually notice very quickly.

Re: Lindroid

#72

Post by nobody9999 »

LoganDark wrote: post #68
nobody9999 wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>They're protecting the TEE Why do Transesophageal Echocardiograms[0] need protecting, and from whom do such diagnostics require protection? I expect I'm missing something, but a web search for 'TEE' only returns that diagnostic test.[1] [0] https://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/atrial-fibrillation/tran... [1] Moral: Don't assume everyone knows what a particular acronym means. Just because it's in your head doesn't mea…

Sorry, TEE stands for Trusted Execution Environment. It's where stuff like DRM executes with access to secrets that the HLOS (Android) can't tamper with. On ARM SoCs the TEE is usually provided as part of TrustZone. No need to patronize.

>Sorry, TEE stands for Trusted Execution Environment.

No apology necessary. I was just a little confused. Thanks for straightening me out!

Re: Lindroid

#73

Post by Nexxxeh »

nobody9999 wrote: post #66
LoganDark wrote: post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm not really sure whom they're protecting with this stuff -- the credit card processing companies, maybe? (small nit: does "whom" even go there?) They're protecting the TEE because they do not want third parties to be able to automate Google Pay through modified software. This isn't necessarily just about normal end users but more like smartphone farms.

>They're protecting the TEE Why do Transesophageal Echocardiograms[0] need protecting, and from whom do such diagnostics require protection? I expect I'm missing something, but a web search for 'TEE' only returns that diagnostic test.[1] [0] https://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/atrial-fibrillation/tran... [1] Moral: Don't assume everyone knows what a particular acronym means. Just because it's in your head doesn't mea…

I think, probably unintentionally, you've misjudged or ignored the tone your message is likely to be read as having.

To me, your comment comes across as having a rude and insulting tone.

I think the person you were replying to read it in a similar tone to me based on their response. ("No need to be patronizing.")

Is that the tone you intended?

A better way of handling it may have been with a simple, "What does TEE mean in this context please? Googling it didn't help me."

I'm asking the question rather than assuming it was intentional, as you put more effort into your comment than is necessary to just be rude.

It feels like you may have been trying to be helpful and just misjudged the tone. Maybe as a fellow neurodivergent person.

Re: Lindroid

#74

Post by LoganDark »

Nexxxeh wrote: post #73
nobody9999 wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>They're protecting the TEE Why do Transesophageal Echocardiograms[0] need protecting, and from whom do such diagnostics require protection? I expect I'm missing something, but a web search for 'TEE' only returns that diagnostic test.[1] [0] https://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/atrial-fibrillation/tran... [1] Moral: Don't assume everyone knows what a particular acronym means. Just because it's in your head doesn't mea…

I think, probably unintentionally, you've misjudged or ignored the tone your message is likely to be read as having. To me, your comment comes across as having a rude and insulting tone. I think the person you were replying to read it in a similar tone to me based on their response. ("No need to be patronizing.") Is that the tone you intended? A better way of handling it may have been with a simple, "What does TEE me…

I feel like this part of their comment:

> According to Piaget[3], people are able to identify that others don't know what's in their heads sometime between ages two and seven.

is a little far to be a simple misjudged tone, even if it was intended as a joke. I did find it a bit funny but it still felt a bit insulting too.

Re: Lindroid

#75

Post by nobody9999 »

Nexxxeh wrote: post #73
nobody9999 wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>They're protecting the TEE Why do Transesophageal Echocardiograms[0] need protecting, and from whom do such diagnostics require protection? I expect I'm missing something, but a web search for 'TEE' only returns that diagnostic test.[1] [0] https://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/atrial-fibrillation/tran... [1] Moral: Don't assume everyone knows what a particular acronym means. Just because it's in your head doesn't mea…

I think, probably unintentionally, you've misjudged or ignored the tone your message is likely to be read as having. To me, your comment comes across as having a rude and insulting tone. I think the person you were replying to read it in a similar tone to me based on their response. ("No need to be patronizing.") Is that the tone you intended? A better way of handling it may have been with a simple, "What does TEE me…

Your assumptions were mostly incorrect.

That said, thank you for your thoughts on this. I'm glad you shared them. Good on you.

That said, I don't need you (or anyone else, for that matter) to tell me how I should or shouldn't interact with others -- as that's incredibly condescending (and incredibly rude as well) and makes a number of unwarranted (as I mentioned) assumptions.

Again, thanks for your thoughts. I'll give them the attention they deserve.

Edit: Fixed prose.

Re: Lindroid

#76

Post by nobody9999 »

LoganDark wrote: post #74
Nexxxeh wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think, probably unintentionally, you've misjudged or ignored the tone your message is likely to be read as having. To me, your comment comes across as having a rude and insulting tone. I think the person you were replying to read it in a similar tone to me based on their response. ("No need to be patronizing.") Is that the tone you intended? A better way of handling it may have been with a simple, "What does TEE me…

I feel like this part of their comment: > According to Piaget[3], people are able to identify that others don't know what's in their heads sometime between ages two and seven. is a little far to be a simple misjudged tone, even if it was intended as a joke. I did find it a bit funny but it still felt a bit insulting too.

>is a little far to be a simple misjudged tone, even if it was intended as a joke. I did find it a bit funny but it still felt a bit insulting too.

No. Not a joke. Just pointing out something you already knew: That I (or anyone else) don't know what's going on inside your mind unless you tell me.

That you ignored such a simple truth and didn't think to define your terms was a waste of my time. As such, I felt insulted at your (apparent) complete lack of respect for the time and attention of others.

Take that as insulting if you wish, and if you find it insulting enough, please ignore me completely going forward. I promise you I won't mind.

Have a good day!

Re: Lindroid

#78

Post by protonbob »

nobody9999 wrote: post #75
Nexxxeh wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think, probably unintentionally, you've misjudged or ignored the tone your message is likely to be read as having. To me, your comment comes across as having a rude and insulting tone. I think the person you were replying to read it in a similar tone to me based on their response. ("No need to be patronizing.") Is that the tone you intended? A better way of handling it may have been with a simple, "What does TEE me…

Your assumptions were mostly incorrect. That said, thank you for your thoughts on this. I'm glad you shared them. Good on you. That said, I don't need you (or anyone else, for that matter) to tell me how I should or shouldn't interact with others -- as that's incredibly condescending (and incredibly rude as well) and makes a number of unwarranted (as I mentioned) assumptions. Again, thanks for your thoughts. I'll giv…

I'm pretty sure you told the GP how they should or should not interact with others by telling them not to use acronyms. I'm don't understand how that's any different.

Re: Lindroid

#79

Post by nobody9999 »

protonbob wrote: post #78
nobody9999 wrote: post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your assumptions were mostly incorrect. That said, thank you for your thoughts on this. I'm glad you shared them. Good on you. That said, I don't need you (or anyone else, for that matter) to tell me how I should or shouldn't interact with others -- as that's incredibly condescending (and incredibly rude as well) and makes a number of unwarranted (as I mentioned) assumptions. Again, thanks for your thoughts. I'll giv…

I'm pretty sure you told the GP how they should or should not interact with others by telling them not to use acronyms. I'm don't understand how that's any different.

>'m pretty sure you told the GP how they should or should not interact with others by telling them not to use acronyms. I'm don't understand how that's any different.

Except I did nothing of the sort. I took the information given and attempted to interpolate (unsuccessfully, I might add) what OP was talking about.

While I did make the point that OP should have realized that others don't know what they're talking about if they don't tell us, I most certainly didn't say they shouldn't use acronyms.

Rather, I chastised them for not defining ambiguous terms, which wasted my time and energy trying to figure out what they were going on about.

Re: Lindroid

#80

Post by Nexxxeh »

nobody9999 wrote: post #75
Nexxxeh wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think, probably unintentionally, you've misjudged or ignored the tone your message is likely to be read as having. To me, your comment comes across as having a rude and insulting tone. I think the person you were replying to read it in a similar tone to me based on their response. ("No need to be patronizing.") Is that the tone you intended? A better way of handling it may have been with a simple, "What does TEE me…

Your assumptions were mostly incorrect. That said, thank you for your thoughts on this. I'm glad you shared them. Good on you. That said, I don't need you (or anyone else, for that matter) to tell me how I should or shouldn't interact with others -- as that's incredibly condescending (and incredibly rude as well) and makes a number of unwarranted (as I mentioned) assumptions. Again, thanks for your thoughts. I'll giv…

I see the benefit of the doubt was unwarranted. Righto.
Post reply on HN