Live data from Hacker News

The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

71–77 of 77 posts

Re: The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is the first pro-mafia comment I read on HN, and of course it’s in “Well Actually,” Normal Form, and I love it Which part of this appeared to be pro-mafia to you? >> It's not exactly the same, because >> If the mafioso goes too far they lose the support of the locals. >> I mean, sure, the population has no recourse when some henchman rapes some bride, but the organisation's management usually enforce their rul…

Welcome, visitor from the past! In our enlightened times, we understand that one truly opposed to something would not intimate that something is anything less than a baby-eating sect of demons who revel at suffering despite reason and self-interest. Only inveterate supporters, probably in the payroll, would do that. (Reading on GP, of course, but I did greatly enjoy “Well, Actually, Normal Form.)

We need an "Anatomy of an HN comment section" starter pack

I know of 5 kinds of posts:

- interesting (uncontroversial)

- news (controversial by default)

- I made something for fun (yay)

- I made something for profit (boo!)

- philosophical

Re: The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The South being considered an actual part of Italy is a pretty new concept and not completely accepted by either the south or the north. The north is sophisticated, cosmopolitan, industrialized, and has tons of arable farmland and just generally money running through it. Culturally it's more French / white European. The south has very little arable land, it is rocky and hilly. It does not lend itself well to large-sc…

I agree with your analysis but Greek weren't merely conqueror, they are part of Sicily because they established themselves there and remained. Large part of Catania and Syracuse are of Greek ascent. About the arable land, I don't know, Sicily is extremely fertile in general and there also some large plains as well like in Palermo. Sicily was extremely rich and prosper during the Normad period and for the Arabs who ca…

Sicily is fertile, but for example much of Calabria is very much not - too rocky/mountainous. The issue is not that there's no fertile land, but the fertile land relative to the population is not a lot in terms of just sustaining the South subsisting on its own, and it certainly doesn't have enough extra fertile land to develop as much agricultural export from the region as the north has.

And it's gotten much much worse in recent years with climate change the heat and drought is getting very serious in the south.

Re: The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

#73
post #3

Oh no, they built tons of cheap affordable housing. How terrible of them! I’d be interested to hear the viewpoints of Sicilians on this one

I recommend visiting the Ecomuseo in Palermo [1] if you ever have the chance. They examine, among other things, the lasting impact of the subpar building of now mostly crumbling structures by the Mafia that still litter the cities of Sicily. Yes, the mafia built housing, but it’s not the kind of social housing we might hope for—it’s mostly slum-like. Of course, the city of Palermo is also EXTREMELY densely populated—…

>> it’s not the kind of social housing we might hope for—it’s mostly slum-like

If the alternative to slums is tent cities, I hope for slums.

Re: The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

#74
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No snark intended below: I'm genuinely curious what the difference is according to you. From where I'm standing I sometimes struggle to see the difference between my government and a mafia. They behave in uncanny similar ways.

It is not impossible for a government to act as a mafia (see Russia). But I believe it's impossible for a mafia to be a functional government, they are just built on different grounds. For me a functional government has the wellbeing of its citizens as a mission. There might be different opinions on how that would look like (hence democracy) but the idea is that; once the government is unchangeable and only cares abo…

>> It is not impossible for a government to act as a mafia (see Russia)

I'm reading the Black Book of Communism and that's my exact impression of the Bolsheviks.

From Goodfellas: "If we wanted something we just took it. If anyone complained twice they got hit so bad, believe me, they never complained again".

That was the Bolsheviks circa 1920.

Re: The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

#75

A different take from a non-Italian. I'm curious what actual Italians think of this: I'm reading a book on how Spain gained and lost a world empire (I'd had it on my shelf forever and never read it): https://www.amazon.com/Empire-Spain-Became-World-1492-1763/d... It said that many northern Italians believe that a big reason the Mafia is so dominant in southern Italy and Sicily is that it was ruled (loosely) by Spain…

The South being considered an actual part of Italy is a pretty new concept and not completely accepted by either the south or the north. The north is sophisticated, cosmopolitan, industrialized, and has tons of arable farmland and just generally money running through it. Culturally it's more French / white European. The south has very little arable land, it is rocky and hilly. It does not lend itself well to large-sc…

Sounds a bit like Afghanistan.

Re: The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

#76
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Regarding Berlusconi from a far, I thought "Thank god nothing like that could happen here (USA)." Ahem. There are so many obvious parallels between Berlusconi and one of own, I can't fathom why it hasn't been discussed. (Maybe it has; I mostly tuned out our kayfabe for my mental health.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/15/opinion/the-trump-berlusc... "Nobody who knows Berlusconi and has watched the rise and rise of Donald Trump can fail to be struck by the parallels."

Well spotted. Thanks.

Re: The construction of the mafioso social capital and the Sack of Palermo (2023)

#77
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is the first pro-mafia comment I read on HN, and of course it’s in “Well Actually,” Normal Form, and I love it Which part of this appeared to be pro-mafia to you? >> It's not exactly the same, because >> If the mafioso goes too far they lose the support of the locals. >> I mean, sure, the population has no recourse when some henchman rapes some bride, but the organisation's management usually enforce their rul…

> Which part of this appeared to be pro-mafia to you? Well, all of it. You put mafia folks into realm of rationality, when we know from numerous accounts (as in thousands and more) that they are extremely emotional, do stupid things and fuck up almost everything they touch, even their own future. Smart criminals behave very differently, its more about negligence and lack of efficient state counter-measures that allow…

>> Which part of this appeared to be pro-mafia to you?

> Well, all of it. You put mafia folks into realm of rationality

Historians may debate to which extent Hitler, Stalin (and Vlad Tepes and Caligula and...) were rational. That doesn't make those historians who argue that they were in fact (more or less) rational "pro-Hitler" or "pro-Stalin".

In short, I don't think the word "pro" means what you think it means.

Post reply on HN