Live data from Hacker News

What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

pubs.aeaweb.org

71–80 of 128 posts

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#71
post #49
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>and widespread cheating It amazes me that teachers would be so unethical. They seem worse than the general population.

"You get what you measure" is broadly applicable and systems need to accomodate that. There's nothing about teachers that makes them less ethical than the the average car emissions system engineer KPMG auditor person

The expectation is that they would be more ethical, in the same way you would expect EG a doctor to be.

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#72
post #32

More people need to be encouraged to become teachers - full stop. Its a valid concern that there are some teachers that are not good, and would be weeded out by performance based metrics. However - everyone else at the school knows who the bad teachers are. They're obvious. They're the ones leaving their class unattended. Doing the bare minimum. These people can't be weeded out right now because there's a shortage of…

I hope you intend to encourage more people to become teachers by incentivizing them with higher pay (however that is distributed within the profession). Moral suasion can only get you so far, and is kinda suspect if you're encouraging people to walk into a bad situation.

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#73
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if the standardized tests aren't administered by the teacher? That seems like it would be an easy solution to get around the cheating problem. As for teaching to the test, what's the real downfall of doing that? Colleges use standardized test scores as the biggest or one of the biggest criteria in admission.

The downfall is that in theory the purpose of school is to educate, not merely get people enough points to be admitted to college.

And the purpose of the test is to see whether the education took. Teaching to the test is the whole point of the test.

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#74

Is this a practical solution in America where taxes are more limited than other nations?

The implication being that countries with more taxes can afford to waste money by paying bad teachers well?

The implication is that countries that fund education more can actually pay good teachers well, so there's room for paying bad teachers less.

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#75
post #5

I saw this discussed on Marginal Revolution today as well. My main question is whether the gains are fundamentally zero-sum, at least in the short term. Some districts implement flexible pay and some don’t, and then the best teachers move to get paid more. And the places that get left behind…? In the long-run, increased pay ought to lead to more high-quality teachers entering the profession. But in the short term, th…

My sister is a very talented leader/organizer who went to teachers college and would love to teach but the pay isn't good enough for what she could get elsewhere.

Yet she still obsessively talks about how bad the teaching systems is here in Ontario, Canada and follows all the studies.

I could 100% see a large increase in talent/quality jumping into the system and taking over the culture. Or at least heavily influencing it. The gaming for tests is also probably a short term effect as well, the old guard doing what it knows best, just more of it.

But Canada will be the last place this sort of reform would happen. The unions completely dominate discourse.

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#76
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Eliminate poverty by eliminating capitalism, a system that literally depends on it. Could you give an example of where this has worked?

Why even engage this sort of thing? It's just going to turn into a flame thread.

Just in case I had something to learn.

Apologies for the risk of conflagration :)

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#78
post #12

I was a public school teacher that worked in a district that attempted to measure teacher value add. There was limited pay for performance based on that metric. And the district I worked in was majority racial minority and majority living in poverty. "Using the expiration of preexisting collective bargaining agreements as a source of exogenous variation in the timing of changes in pay, I show that the introduction of…

What if the standardized tests aren't administered by the teacher? That seems like it would be an easy solution to get around the cheating problem. As for teaching to the test, what's the real downfall of doing that? Colleges use standardized test scores as the biggest or one of the biggest criteria in admission.

Teaching the test narrows the subject matter significantly. Some of the most important things I learned in school weren't directly on tests: critical thinking, fallacies, cultural studies, how to avoid being exploited.

That said, in some circumstances only teaching the test could be an improvement.

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#79
post #50

If they want to improve teachers performance - reduce the $hit modern society is making them deal with. They're very under paid. How would you like to deal with corraling 23'ish hyper nut jobs all at different levels? That you have to be their parents, psychologist, DEI, identity fosterer, special education teachers etc. Funding in many schools isn't there now for specialists to do these roles.... because teachers wa…

When I worked in a relatively well to do suburban district I had class sizes up to 35 students. Because I was a math teacher, administration did their best to keep our class sizes under 30, teachers of other core classes were more likely to have 30+ students, and classes that didn't have standardized tests might have more than 35. If I recall correctly, every year I taught 9th graders, who are often hyper nutjobs.

Re: What happens when we pay public high school teachers based on performance

#80
post #63
post #32

More people need to be encouraged to become teachers - full stop. Its a valid concern that there are some teachers that are not good, and would be weeded out by performance based metrics. However - everyone else at the school knows who the bad teachers are. They're obvious. They're the ones leaving their class unattended. Doing the bare minimum. These people can't be weeded out right now because there's a shortage of…

Hire mature and experienced people as teachers. It is easy to assess someone mature based on their life achievements. No need to attract greedy ones as greed isn't the most desired competence for people who will work with children.

The worst, meanest most bitter teachers I ever had were all old. The younger ones didn't have time to turn sour yet.
Post reply on HN