Live data from Hacker News

PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

github.com

71–80 of 83 posts

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#71

curious to hear does anyone know what the mentioned alternatives are? a super simple to use wireguard control plane is super valuable and PiVPN seemed to fit that gap perfectly unfortunate that it's come to an end but it's nice to hear the maintainer moving on in such a positive way :)

Tailscale.

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#72
post #50

Anyone got a recommendation for a router with Wireguard support baked in? I've been running PiVPN on a separate box but since I need a new router anyways and it's not going to be supported, that might be a viable replacement.

You can easily install Wireguard on EdgeOS (VyOS fork) 1.x and 2.x and 3.x will have it natively. The OS is kind of RIP otherwise, so I cannot recommend it, but Ubiquiti just released a new UnifiOS-based router with 5 2.5 GHz ports saturating 1.6 GHz with IDS. That, or some random AliExpress x86-64 router with OPNsense.

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#73
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can maintain it right now. Make a fork, and continue development. You might even get some shoutout from the original devs. It's all open source after all, making this repo read-only doesn't mean the project's dead if the community is vibrant enough.

The community matters. It's one thing to get control of the official websites, official packages, etc, and another to have to tell every single user "come use my fork".

And author is pretty explicit about this:

> "But I want and can maintain it, can I take it over?" Let me put it plain and simple: No! I don't know you, I don't trust you! Fork it and carry on!

For something security critical like VPN, ownership change is a big deal. Users trust project's reputation. So if there is not a a trusted successor, shutting it down is way better that giving it up to unknown people.

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#74
post #40

curious to hear does anyone know what the mentioned alternatives are? a super simple to use wireguard control plane is super valuable and PiVPN seemed to fit that gap perfectly unfortunate that it's come to an end but it's nice to hear the maintainer moving on in such a positive way :)

wg-easy comes to mind

+1, it's amazing

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#75
post #42
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That scenario is exactly what PiVPN is avoiding by refusing to nominate a new maintainer and telling interested parties to fork--so what is your actual and concrete objection? Fork the project. Earn your own trust.

> so what is your actual and concrete objection? This: > I wish people would put their projects in something like https://www.codeshelter.co so anyone who's interested can maintain them, instead of just killing them

So to me that says you want it both ways, for while I appreciate what the codeshelter folks are trying to do, it is a task that is going to turn out Sudden But Inevitable Betrayals. Instead of contacting a maintainer directly, they just look sufficiently polished that codeshelter says "yeah, sure, OK" and hands it over.

Forking the project and earning your own trust really is the safe path forward.

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've been giving less and less attention to PiVPN, and the desire to keep up with it is no longer what it once was. I wonder if financial/monetary incentive would change this. I don't think it would personally (because putting a value on your free time/mental load/time you can spend with your loved ones doing something else away from the PC is precious) On the flip side... $500/mo? $1k/mo? $5k/mo? I'm sure most pro…

A lot of these projects are made in people's leisure time, without profitability, for other fellow geeks, and the users also uses them in their hobbies. And as fellow geeks, we are more likely to be financially poised to be on the other side of the equation: getting paid to write code, rather than being able to pay a developer's wage, at least not in the long term, not in any maintainable manner. Can you afford to pa…

Agreed. Also often the gap between what people will pay for a hobby project and what money is being made at a tech company by the people who have the hobby is vast. Sometimes there are contractual restrictions on taking money from other jobs simultaneously that complicate it.

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#77

curious to hear does anyone know what the mentioned alternatives are? a super simple to use wireguard control plane is super valuable and PiVPN seemed to fit that gap perfectly unfortunate that it's come to an end but it's nice to hear the maintainer moving on in such a positive way :)

After meaning for years to spend the 2-3 hours I’d need to set up wire guard and get all my devices on it that I’d want on it (it’s a bit fiddly and time consuming, and inevitably with projects like that, there’s some dumb problem that comes up that wastes a bunch of time) I just did the free tier of Tailscale. Server, two Apple TVs, a couple phones, a tablet, and a laptop all on it in like 15 minutes flat. With one…

2-3hours? Just try wg-easy, it should not take more than 10minutes.

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#78
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could probably get someone , but would you get someone good (competent, trustworthy, etc)? Perhaps Jia Tan is looking for a new gig.

>You could probably get someone, but would you get someone good (competent, trustworthy, etc)? The same could be asked of people who work on open projects for free, could it not? Is a financial reward (or lack of such reward), in and of itself, some sort of implicit indicator of the quality of the person putting forth the effort?

Maybe not quality of the person, but quality of the job done, absolutely.

When working for free on my hobby projects, I do my absolute best. Now try to pay me $3.50 per hour for similar work (strictly +Infinity% more than before!), I'll probably flat out refuse / won't focus on it as much.

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#79

curious to hear does anyone know what the mentioned alternatives are? a super simple to use wireguard control plane is super valuable and PiVPN seemed to fit that gap perfectly unfortunate that it's come to an end but it's nice to hear the maintainer moving on in such a positive way :)

https://github.com/angristan/openvpn-install or if you want to be free from your distro's OpenSSL version: https://github.com/ix-ai/openvpn (recommended, just rebuild the container if it becomes outdated)

Re: PiVPN v4.6.0: The End

#80
post #50

Anyone got a recommendation for a router with Wireguard support baked in? I've been running PiVPN on a separate box but since I need a new router anyways and it's not going to be supported, that might be a viable replacement.

Mikrotik hAP ax3 or any router with RouterOS that supports wireguard natively.
Post reply on HN