This just shows that employees have 0 power and companies like Google are more than ready to fire you if you get in their way. Businesses that live and breathe billions do not care and any attempt to cave into employee demands, then the investors will move in and force it through their changes. (Especially public companies)
Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
71–80 of 368 posts
Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#72My old manager put it best: No politics and religion in the workplace. Seriously, it's as simple as that. We are here to work, not philosophize about politics and current events.
Management works to serve those corporate interests, so it is in their interest to convey the message that the appropriate thing to do is be silent and comply.
Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#73My old manager put it best: No politics and religion in the workplace. Seriously, it's as simple as that. We are here to work, not philosophize about politics and current events.
A lot of work can be inherently political. If your company pivots into mass surveillance is it unreasonable to speak up if it's against your ethics framework?
Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#74Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#75Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#76>“This behavior is not okay, _regardless of the issue,_ and the employee was terminated for violating our policies.” There are some issues that are worth speaking up about. There are some issues that are worth being fired over.
Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#77This just shows that employees have 0 power and companies like Google are more than ready to fire you if you get in their way. Businesses that live and breathe billions do not care and any attempt to cave into employee demands, then the investors will move in and force it through their changes. (Especially public companies)
If a person disagrees with Google's policies, and are not in a position (as VP) to change them, they should simply quit the company.
If instead, they decide to take deliberate actions which hurt the business (and thereby their peers), then the company should quit them.
Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is why we need tech unions. We should be able to take an ethical stance without getting fired.
They weren't fired for taking a stance, they were fired for how they took the stance.
The being fired is an implicit sign that the people trying to control the collective narrative of the organization feel their grip slipping.
Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
This needs to be emphasized more. It's not that they took a stance, it's definitely how they did it that warranted being fired over it.
What's a good way to take a stance?
Being "polite" is nice if the person you're talking to is also nice. If the guy wanted to bring attention to the fact he did it very well.
Re: Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, shuts forum
#80>“This behavior is not okay, _regardless of the issue,_ and the employee was terminated for violating our policies.” There are some issues that are worth speaking up about. There are some issues that are worth being fired over.