Live data from Hacker News

Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

bbc.com

71–80 of 95 posts

Re: Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

#71
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you trying to stop sound getting in or getting out? In the first case some decent earplugs should be sufficient.

Nathan for You S3.E6 also explored this idea as a hotel amenity for sexually active parents.

The show was wholesome enough that we started watching it with the kids...

...and then that episode came on.

Most awkward family night ever.

Re: Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

#74
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you trying to stop sound getting in or getting out? In the first case some decent earplugs should be sufficient.

No, they are not. Imagine some construction work with heavy drilling outside your bedroom window.

Imagine if, with advances in materials science, that it was. Could we make a 3 meter cube that was acoustically isolated from the rest of the world? Then they could do all the heavy drilling they want.

Re: Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

#75

But why are they up off the floor? I read the article... did I miss that part?

Same reason most beds are, pests.

This is what we're told but "because pests" is a bit ambiguous.

Ever had rats? Fuckers will climb literally anything and get into literally everything. "Roof rats" are a thing.

Elevation does not deter any pest I'm aware of (bears maybe). Your bed will get bedbugs same as a futon, but in the case of rodents their droppings always fall downward. Keeping stuff off the ground keeps it away from filth.

Re: Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

#76
post #39
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's most likely false, considering the rate of malnourishment before the Industrial and Agricultural Revolutions.

There’s some nuance/caveats, but here’s a study showing humans lost height during the switch from hunting/gathering to agriculture: https://modernfarmer.com/2022/04/farming-made-our-ancestors-...

Yes, however I don't think many hunter/gatherers had cupboards to sleep in...

Re: Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

#78

These remind me of one of Christopher Alexander's design patterns. He said children's rooms should be actually a room with a shared play space in the middle and cubbies built into the walls on the side with curtains for privacy.

Many of Alexander's "design patterns" were terrible for actual living on a reasonable budget. Like what are you supposed to do with that space when the children get older? I read the book and was not impressed.

Re: Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

#79

It's bad because you are isolated. You need to get grounded in order to sleep properly: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15650465/ Big fluffy beds way off the floor are bad. It's interesting to note that the above finds it most effective for women. The below is most effective for men. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105021/ It shouldn't actually matter your sex. To add, buddhist monks must sleep on the…

> It's bad because you are isolated. You need to get grounded in order to sleep properly: > https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15650465/ This was published by the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, which has also published articles on how homeopathy is effective. I don't know that I would consider it a high quality source.

I sourced the NIH. I'm not familiar with the infinite number of journals and their associated possible biases.

I did get downvoted badly. I was not aware the NIH was so untrustworthy. People usually accept them as a source.

I will now question the NIH. Thanks for telling me about the NIH.

Re: Reasons medieval people slept in cupboards

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's bad because you are isolated. You need to get grounded in order to sleep properly: > https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15650465/ This was published by the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, which has also published articles on how homeopathy is effective. I don't know that I would consider it a high quality source.

I noticed the same thing, but this makes me more concerned: the link has nih.gov in it. Usually when I read articles from that URL, I tend to put a bit more trust in them than say healthline.org or some blogspam or something like that. Does this mean I have to start taking nih.gov articles with a grain of salt too?

The UK NIH unfortunately has a reality ignoring relationship with "homeopathy" and other "alternative" medicines, up to and including the current king being a vocal Proponent of using more alternative medicine to reduce costs and improve health.

It's not great.

Post reply on HN