Live data from Hacker News

Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

borncity.com

71–80 of 85 posts

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#71
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like what? There is no real open source comparable option to VMware if are running your own hypervisors. KVM? Not even close, you need a host of other tools to get what you have with esxi and vcenter. You’ll spend months just finding and configuring a disjointed hodgepodge of tools to get what you could have setup in a day. And even then you have a fargile system that is likely to break any time you update one tool i…

> There is no real open source comparable option to VMware if are running your own hypervisors Well the first question is, do you actually need hypervisors? In a lot of cases, the answer is no, or not for many of the workloads. In others it's 100% yes. Then, after you've decided you actually do need a hypervisor, there's actually tons of choice - Proxmox (very good and advanced KVM wrapper), Nutanix's AHV, oVirt (fut…

>Problem is, many VMware users are set in their ways and want an exact and 1:1 replacement, without even considering they were only doings things that way because that was the only tool they knew and had at their disposal, not because it's actually a good way of doing things.

Correct. You have entire teams in your average Fortune 500 who have built the entire career on being the VMware team.

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#72
post #15

It's embarrassing how poorly Broadcom have rushed into throwing the baby out with the bathwater for no reason. They could have taken a slower approach instead of doing everything as soon as the deal officially closed... I hope they lose as much business as possible over this, everyone should be looking into alternatives because they're such a shitshow.

>everyone should be looking into alternatives I'm interested to hear this community's take on what an alternative to vmware is. And I'm not talking about just ESX, I'm talking about their entire ecosystem including vsphere and all of it's features that an enterprise environment depends on.

OpenStack

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#73

You can find working vSphere keygens on some sketchy site. I encourage anyone in a tough spot to use one. You paid for the product, fuck them.

Honestly that's the sad story behind drm in a nutshell. Pirates get a better product.

So much so that even Microsoft support reps are using the pirating tools

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#74
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is no real open source comparable option to VMware if are running your own hypervisors Well the first question is, do you actually need hypervisors? In a lot of cases, the answer is no, or not for many of the workloads. In others it's 100% yes. Then, after you've decided you actually do need a hypervisor, there's actually tons of choice - Proxmox (very good and advanced KVM wrapper), Nutanix's AHV, oVirt (fut…

>Problem is, many VMware users are set in their ways and want an exact and 1:1 replacement, without even considering they were only doings things that way because that was the only tool they knew and had at their disposal, not because it's actually a good way of doing things. Correct. You have entire teams in your average Fortune 500 who have built the entire career on being the VMware team.

Well, unfortunately for them, it's the time to evolve or get left behind while others in the organisation (either users who are unhappy or higher ups looking at budgets) try to push for change, with good reason.

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#75
post #15

It's embarrassing how poorly Broadcom have rushed into throwing the baby out with the bathwater for no reason. They could have taken a slower approach instead of doing everything as soon as the deal officially closed... I hope they lose as much business as possible over this, everyone should be looking into alternatives because they're such a shitshow.

>everyone should be looking into alternatives I'm interested to hear this community's take on what an alternative to vmware is. And I'm not talking about just ESX, I'm talking about their entire ecosystem including vsphere and all of it's features that an enterprise environment depends on.

No two environments are the same. Instead of looking for a like for like total replacement (even though you actually don't use all VMware features or use some only because they were the only way possible in VMware's ecosystem and not because they're actually any good (vRA, Log Insight)), evaluate your actual needs and what do you need to run under what conditions. You'll probably end up discovering that any of Proxmox, OpenStack Nutanux, oVirt, Ganetti, Kubernetes (with or without KubeVirt), Nomad (with or without VMs) will cover most if not all that you need.

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We use ganeti and I'm ridiculously happy with it. When I came on board we were using ganeti for dev/stg and VMWare for production. But the difficulty of monitoring VMWare (we were moving away from SAN to local storage, and doing a RAID array monitor was a PITA) and administering (via Windows GUI, which I had to run via a VM on my Linux workstations), plus the licensing weirdness (clusters of size 5 were a sweet spot,…

>Windows GUI I assume you're referring to the (ancient) VIC? Vsphere has been all web based for a long long time now. It had probably just never been upgraded. Also I'm curious why the move to local storage, what do you do if a host dies?

Good to know it's got something web-based now. Is the licensing still got that 5-machine sweet spot?

What we did if a machine failed was: design our apps to be resilient. Basically everything we run can survive machine failures via either app design or corosync/pacemaker.

We're a pretty small shop, but we ran an experiment of trying a SAN (an HP of some sort) and every year like clockwork the redundant SAN would fall over and take our whole stack with it. Every year like clockwork HP would say "you aren't running the latest firmware, try this one". Equallogic at another job was super reliable but also was easily twice the price of the HP.

The simplicity and redundancy of local storage has largely been a huge win. We did have a couple of Dell machines where the drive arrays seemed to fall over, possibly because of too much IO, but Dell identified a particular SSD and the array has been solid for 3-4 years since then.

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#77
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We use ganeti and I'm ridiculously happy with it. When I came on board we were using ganeti for dev/stg and VMWare for production. But the difficulty of monitoring VMWare (we were moving away from SAN to local storage, and doing a RAID array monitor was a PITA) and administering (via Windows GUI, which I had to run via a VM on my Linux workstations), plus the licensing weirdness (clusters of size 5 were a sweet spot,…

I used ganeti 10 years ago at a company I was at. It was really great then. Glad to see it's still worked on.

It's mostly in maintenance mode right now, but that's also kind of fine because it is pretty solid. I would like a better ZFS storage story, but it does have great DRBD, LVM, and Ceph stories.

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>everyone should be looking into alternatives I'm interested to hear this community's take on what an alternative to vmware is. And I'm not talking about just ESX, I'm talking about their entire ecosystem including vsphere and all of it's features that an enterprise environment depends on.

OpenStack

So 10 years ago I was part of a project which pitted VMware vsphere against openstack. VMware was cheaper opex by a factor of 4 and they were using ESXi as the hypervisor. Openstack is a non starter for enterprise environments.

Now with containers and kubernetes being the standard, openstack is another very very heavy distribution your organization must maintain

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#79
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>everyone should be looking into alternatives I'm interested to hear this community's take on what an alternative to vmware is. And I'm not talking about just ESX, I'm talking about their entire ecosystem including vsphere and all of it's features that an enterprise environment depends on.

No two environments are the same. Instead of looking for a like for like total replacement (even though you actually don't use all VMware features or use some only because they were the only way possible in VMware's ecosystem and not because they're actually any good (vRA, Log Insight)), evaluate your actual needs and what do you need to run under what conditions. You'll probably end up discovering that any of Proxmo…

You will also probably end up discovering your costs drastically inflate. There is a reason why companies stick with bundled products. Find a way to bundle that mismash of software you mentioned into a single pane of glass with a 4 year support guarantee and you will be rich.

You will quickly find out why it hasn’t been done and why Redhat and Microsoft look so promising after all

Re: Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OpenStack

So 10 years ago I was part of a project which pitted VMware vsphere against openstack. VMware was cheaper opex by a factor of 4 and they were using ESXi as the hypervisor. Openstack is a non starter for enterprise environments. Now with containers and kubernetes being the standard, openstack is another very very heavy distribution your organization must maintain

OpenStack's got Magnum for that need.

The framework for deployment has vastly improved.

Post reply on HN