Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't have to know. But if you won't take a job because of OS, you should ask upfront in the interview. Better to end it right there instead of continuing further. Heck, ask before the interview through email and get it over with.
> But if you won't take a job because of OS, you should ask upfront in the interview. If working the job requires a specific OS you should mention it right upfront in the interview, or better yet the job description. Why is it the candidates job to telepathically guess at what hard requirements might exist? You have a requirement, state it.
Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
71–80 of 92 posts
Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#72Supporting multiple OSes means extra complexity & work for MIS, IT, and DevOps departments. Also, there are sometimes issues that crop up due to OS-specific work (e.g. newline characters) or tools that are only supported on certain OSes. So I understand why some companies are more prescriptive about which OSes they are allowed to use.
Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#73I don't need to think in order to interact with it and the tools I have installed on it. Anything different and it gets in the way. A little is fine but each annoyance compounds on the others.
If the client requires me to use their machines, my preference would be Mac first, Linux second. Windows kills my productivity, my mood and my will to work.
Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is nothing correct or incorrect about preferences. You choose industries as a matter of preference, too. Is it correct or incorrect to work in healthcare?
Preference is not the same thing as "I wont take the job if you do Windows" etc. We all prefer things of course. I prefer Macs for example. But will I refuse a job because it uses Windows ? Naah. I will look at everything else that is more important to me which are the team, the work, the goals, whats in it for me, do I see a career path here etc.
Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#75Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#76Mandatory Windows is highly indicative of push-button GUI-centric IT, separate from development and managing everything.
If that's the case, see if you're allowed to install anything you want, whenever you like. Quite possibly things are locked down and dev-frustrating.
If you take the job, be sure to find out if they automatically install updates and reboot your machine at night . . . that can hurt if it's not expected.
And maybe find out how much they spy on your activity (without asking directly because that will draw scrutiny).
Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't have to know. But if you won't take a job because of OS, you should ask upfront in the interview. Better to end it right there instead of continuing further. Heck, ask before the interview through email and get it over with.
> But if you won't take a job because of OS, you should ask upfront in the interview. If working the job requires a specific OS you should mention it right upfront in the interview, or better yet the job description. Why is it the candidates job to telepathically guess at what hard requirements might exist? You have a requirement, state it.
Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#78Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#79But I’d certainly think twice about starting at a company running on MS365, as I’m well spoiled by using Workspace for almost a decade now.
Re: Is primary OS a dealbreaker for you (when taking a new job)?
#80Although my preference goes like this: FreeBSD > OpenBSD > MacOS > GNU/Linux > Windows, if my employer wants me to drive in reverse to reach my destination, I will do it.