Live data from Hacker News

uBlock Origin 1.53

github.com

71–80 of 293 posts

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#71
post #11

Unsure of provenance for this link, but it shows your browser's current success / failure state for blocking youtube anti-adware efforts. https://drhyperion451.github.io/does-uBO-bypass-yt/

It's not actually showing success in blocking - it's showing whether uBO's filters are up-to-date with the latest youtube scripts. It is possible that youtube has updated, and none of the new ids are put into the pastebin yet, and thus, adblock fails.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#72
post #48

From the “uBO works best in Firefox” page, I found this gem: > Firefox will wait for uBO to be ready before sending network requests from already opened tab(s) at browser launch. > In Chromium-based browsers, this is not the case. Tracker/advertisement payloads may find their way into already opened tabs before uBO is ready, while Firefox will properly filter these. That’s a hell of a “bug” in Chromium, that blocker…

[dead]

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#73
post #41

gorhill should be given a Nobel Prize and a knighthood for contributions to humanity.

No kidding. How do we thank this person? Compensate the effort?

he has explicitly denied the option for donations, which is excellent moral standing from my POV. However, it does beg the question - how can the community reward people who want to do this sort of work?

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#75
post #48

From the “uBO works best in Firefox” page, I found this gem: > Firefox will wait for uBO to be ready before sending network requests from already opened tab(s) at browser launch. > In Chromium-based browsers, this is not the case. Tracker/advertisement payloads may find their way into already opened tabs before uBO is ready, while Firefox will properly filter these. That’s a hell of a “bug” in Chromium, that blocker…

[flagged]

Not wait for third party calls, but wait for third party calls from _remote_ third party websites?

Your logic is utterly flawed.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#76
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I want my browser to load ads as fast as possible" is an interesting take

Why did you make a new account just for this comment?

Some people have a weird habit of creating a throwaway account for every comment they make, no matter how mundane. I’m not sure what the rationale is, something privacy-ish i guess?

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#77
post #9

I've been using uBlock since shortly after it launched, and I'd rather lose access to all Google services than not have an ad blocker. I seriously question how people use a browser without one. Completely changes how the web feels.

I'm just visiting fewer websites/pages, i.e. those with no ads at all (like this forum) or those with less intrusive ones (such as old.reddit.com). As for websites like YT, I ended up just watching fewer videos (because of the ads).

All in all I see it as a net positive.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#78
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder what the CO2 emissions of all these ads are?

A lot, given the sheer number of network requests a single ad can spawn

"A lot", compared to what? A single household? Probably. As a percentage of overall global electricity consumption? Probably negligible.

Some math with conservative estimates:

* power consumption of mobile processor: 5W

* daily ad use: 1 hour (assume it's 100% cpu for the entire time)

* smartphone users: 7.8 billion (world population)

Total yearly electricity consumption given the above: 2.8 TWh

World electricity consumption: 23,921 TWh in 2019

Re: uBlock Origin 1.53

#80
post #12
post #9

I've been using uBlock since shortly after it launched, and I'd rather lose access to all Google services than not have an ad blocker. I seriously question how people use a browser without one. Completely changes how the web feels.

This. I've pretty much stopped using YouTube since the adblocker blocker shut me out. I figure it's a good time to kick a bad habit. :D

I still use adblocker on everything else and I know YT without adblock / premium is terrible.

However, YT premium is only 2-3 USD/mo in India. So, I use that to get ad-free experience on YT and also YT music is great.

Post reply on HN