Interestingly I ran into this exact problem with my work MacBook Pro M1 upgrading to Ventura 13.6 and assumed it was a totally isolated incident. I don't have a dual-boot setup either, just a single macOS install. The computer was connected to a Thunderbolt Display during the update which I assume had the same effect of changing the refresh rate to something other-than-ProMotion that the linked article mentions. I ha…
macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
71–80 of 290 posts
Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#72Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
The messiness of resolutions during boot always annoyed me on PCs. It was understandable back in the days of BIOS, but ith the advent of UEFI it seems like it should be possible to run EFI config screens and the like at monitor native rez (or at minimum, native aspect ratio) but I’ve never seen this… it’s always 1024x768 or somesuch stretched to fit a 16:9 monitor which looks awful.
My old AM3+ motherboard has an option for full screen boot logo, and it starts in full HD, continuing with systemd boot, all in 1080p. I thought this wasn't really a problem anymore.
I do recall my last motherboard had an option for a splash which was centered in a black screen, so you could basically display it at native resolution with no stretching and it would look great and seamless. I wish every motherboard had that splash option now.
Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is depressing. They clearly have they ability ($$$) to do the required amount of manual QA, but don't. Or there was QA and someone decided that your case still wasn't enough to hold up the release. In my mind, when we pay that ridiculous Apple premium on RAM and storage, we pay for excellent quality in SW/HW. They also need to deliver that quality.
Or they did QA but just happened to miss this issue. Most companies would consider "the upgrade sometimes bricks the device" to be a release-stopping bug, I'm betting Apple is among them.
These days it's just a bunch of wannabes trying too hard to be him.
Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#75I am so terrified of this upgrade that I think I'll wait a whole year. That's not a good thing.
Any time I start a new video project now, I save it instantly because Command+S still works, but if it opens the Save As dialog then it frequently won’t.
Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good UEFI like Surface devices is native resolution so you can have flicker-free boot. My Gigabyte motherboard recently got native resolution with a UEFI update.
I don't understand why modeset causes flicker - fade to black, turn off screen, change resolution, turn on screen, fade to image.
Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would 60 FPS CSS animations look bad on high refresh displays?
Well the CSS transition wouldn't run at 60 fps, it would run at 120 fps, no? An animation that looks slick at 120 fps might look too fast/slow/complex/whatever on a common 60 hz screen. So if I was still doing this sort of development, I'd prefer to be working on a 60 hz monitor.
I've been advocating (and using) high refresh displays for over two decades and I find your reasoning preposterous. Downgrading to crappy 60 Hz monitor for nothing.
Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or they did QA but just happened to miss this issue. Most companies would consider "the upgrade sometimes bricks the device" to be a release-stopping bug, I'm betting Apple is among them.
Apple still hasn't put up any official page about the issue though, nor does it appear they've pulled the update. Even if it missed QA, why haven't they made any official comment?
Re: macOS Sonoma Boot Failures
#79This seems like a very unusual bug by Apple standards. Makes me consider upgrading to new macbooks...