71–80 of 114 posts
"Completely different"? All of the new values listed are practically synonyms of the former (with the exception of the "AGI focus" addition). This article is clickbait at best
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
> his core value are "we market towards what will make us money" That's exactly what "make something people love" means. To love a product means to pay money for it.
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
> his core value are "we market towards what will make us money" That's exactly what "make something people love" means. To love a product means to pay money for it.
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
> his core value are "we market towards what will make us money" That's exactly what "make something people love" means. To love a product means to pay money for it.
The real question would be why anyone cares about empty mission statements like this anyway? Parsing them for meaning is nearly as useful as parsing your morning bowel movement to predict your day.
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
> his core value are "we market towards what will make us money" That's exactly what "make something people love" means. To love a product means to pay money for it.
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
Happy to see OpenAI embrace direct doxastic voluntarism.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> his core value are "we market towards what will make us money" That's exactly what "make something people love" means. To love a product means to pay money for it.
But does anyone really, actually love enterprise accounting software? Or do they pay money for it because it’s a means towards something they actually love?