Earlier quoted context omitted.
They aren't separate discussions, they're directly tied to determining abuse material. Revenge porn is an example of abusive material, despite the subject not being abused in the material usually, they're considered abusive material due to the intent to cause abuse through distribution. So if either case applies, whether it's training based on certain images, or it becomes a gateway, these are discussions to be had d…
Reading the parent post I think he would believe that revenge porn is abusive material, because there is a person who is getting abused with the distribution of the content, the person didn't consent the distribution. CP is abusive because a child was abused in the creation of the content. The doubt that the author of the parent post has is (from what I understand): who is getting abused with the creation and distrib…
So would it be okay to distribute "revenge porn" imagery after the subject has died?