Live data from Hacker News

Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

gameworldobserver.com

71–80 of 100 posts

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#71
post #18

> Two previous games, Divinity: Original Sin and Original Sin II, “worth of tech and institutional knowledge to draw from”; Divinity: Original Sin was one of the best games I've ever played. I don't game much these days but that one sucked me in hard. I tried playing other CRPGs (Divinity was my introduction to them) to fill the void but they didn't have the fun combat that Divinity did (Path of Exile) or were very s…

Pillars of Eternity is a spiritual successor to Baldurs Gate, can't recommend it enough.

I recently got into PoE and I very much agree. It's been a long time since a CRPG sucked me in the way that PoE 1 has.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#72
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes-but watching tv is a social~ish event, i.e with your SO. It’s really not my personal time.

That's on you. I prefer spending some actual quality of time (having a walk, having a conversation) with my SO instead of staying idly next to my SO and half consider it couples time.

Right but if we're dealing with time constraints then it's makes sense that watching something both of you are interested in _together_ is a more efficient use of collective time than watching it separately and talking about it during another activity.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#73
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Triple-A is a designation given to games published by big studios.

Triple-A is a designation given to games developed by big studios. Just because it's published by EA or Microsoft doesn't make a game AAA.

Not even that. What matters is the budget and the team size, not the size of the studio. Rockstar Table-Tennis was not a AAA game despite coming from the AAA developer.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#74
post #18

> Two previous games, Divinity: Original Sin and Original Sin II, “worth of tech and institutional knowledge to draw from”; Divinity: Original Sin was one of the best games I've ever played. I don't game much these days but that one sucked me in hard. I tried playing other CRPGs (Divinity was my introduction to them) to fill the void but they didn't have the fun combat that Divinity did (Path of Exile) or were very s…

Pillars of Eternity is a spiritual successor to Baldurs Gate, can't recommend it enough.

Unfortunately, writing is abysmal. Enormous amounts of meaningless, forgettable worldbuilding that feels like a DM who spent too much time reading Silmarillion.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#75
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Triple-A is a designation given to games developed by big studios. Just because it's published by EA or Microsoft doesn't make a game AAA.

Not even that. What matters is the budget and the team size, not the size of the studio. Rockstar Table-Tennis was not a AAA game despite coming from the AAA developer.

I meant it as a necessary but not sufficient criterion.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#76
Is this a joke?

Larian Studios makes good games, but by no means are they a "gold" standard.

The Divinity series has a very interesting take on the RPG genre that's not to everyone's liking. And their world-building chops so far are somewhat lacking, compared to the original Baldur's Gate series.

It's also going to be interesting how faithful it is to the mechanics of D&D, and whether Larian again will make a game where you have to scrape by every right, rather than feeling like a powerful RPG character.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#77

>Diablo IV senior designer Chris Balser also agreed with Nelson Jr., saying that it is important to remember that not all studios operate under the same conditions. He compared Baldur’s Gate 3 to Ultima VII, the favorite RPG of Larian founder Swen Vincke — “that’s a game that had 12 years of prior games feeding into it.” So does Diablo IV. I understand this sentiment for smaller studios, but from Activision Blizzard?…

Yeah, what he said is pretty comical given Blizzard's resources and the rich history of Diablo franchise. What a clown.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#78
post #51

Weird that it's called Baldur's Gate 3 when it has basically nothing to do with BG 1 and 2. If they really wanted to use the Baldur's Gate name for easy publicity they should've gone the Dark Alliance route and added a subtitle to set it apart. Now it just seems like a low effort, audience alienating cash grab. And really, they couldn't make a high tier epic level adventure for the God of Murder to go on? They had to…

This comment is wrong on so many levels it's hilarious.

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#79
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At this point, I consider a AAA rating to be a signifier of mediocrity. If something is being touted as AAA, I can be pretty sure it will be a disappointment. There are two factors that cause this: The amount of hype creates expectations that can not be met, and the cost of production is so high a studio can't afford to deliver everything they have to. The value proposition is just not there. I find that indie and mi…

Sony's been knocking it out of the park with their AAA releases though. The last few they've released (Spider-Man: Miles Morales, God of War: Ragnarok, Returnal, Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart, Horizon: Forbidden West) have all been extremely fun, polished, and devoid of microtransactions.

While not developed by Sony, Elden Ring and FFXVI are definitely AAA releases and they are both far from mediocre

Re: Baldur's Gate 3: New Standard for the RPG Genre?

#80
post #61
post #48

>Two previous games, Divinity: Original Sin and Original Sin II, “worth of tech and institutional knowledge to draw from” I wish there were more games like the 1st Divinity Original Sin. Personally one of the best humour and writing in a game I'v ever played. Very laid back and down to earth, and not taking itself very seriously (considering the fantasy cRPG genre) Original Sin 2 is good, actually better, but it's mo…

> Original Sin 2 is good, actually better, but it's more mature and more dark, totally changed the tone from the first game Devoured both (500+ HRS on DOS2) and I agree, however DOS2 has the most fun combat I ever experienced in a game, not only in RPGs.

DOS2 combat is truly the top of its class, nothing even comes close.
Post reply on HN