Live data from Hacker News

Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

fullfact.org

71–80 of 158 posts

Re: Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

#71
post #47
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow look how cool you are bringing politics into this health issue (which takes place in the UK).

I’m all for keeping politics out of non political discussions for sure but I don’t see any political connection in using a public figure for an example.

I guess the political connection is the politician. As opposed to eg the rock.

Re: Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

#72

This is gender affirming care.

Are you sure? This is the UK (not US), where eg the Tavistock clinic was closed down.

Seems to be nothing to do with Tavistock, and transmasc people are (perhaps surprisingly) never mentioned in the article. The OP was making the point that "making your body conform to your gender" is also something that cis people can and do do.

(By the time it was closed down the queues at the Tavistock were on the order of years, so lots of UK trans people have had to go private at some point)

Re: Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

#73

Used responsibly, testosterone supplementation has multiple upsides with relatively little downside, even for men who do not have naturally low T. Unfortunately it looks like a few tik-tok kids are going to ruin it for everyone. Same as most good things in life I guess.

Health impacts on the individual users of trt are just one aspect, it impacts other people. I live in an area where use is common and I'm tired of running into obviously roiding men who act much more aggressive than normal people in public. My experiences are retail and and driving. I've assumed that the tacit approval for steroid usage among law enforcement in the US has at least partially responsible police brutali…

Are you even confident in your ability to spot someone who is "roiding" brother? TRT is a pretty standard hormonal therapy that helps men with low testosterone levels, it is not comparable to dbol or other literal anabolic steroids. In most men it will improve attitude and mood, not cause "roid rage".

Re: Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

#75

Used responsibly, testosterone supplementation has multiple upsides with relatively little downside, even for men who do not have naturally low T. Unfortunately it looks like a few tik-tok kids are going to ruin it for everyone. Same as most good things in life I guess.

> Unfortunately it looks like a few tik-tok kids are going to ruin it for everyone. Same as most good things in life I guess.

What an unhinged comment

Re: Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd be willing to bet a substantial number of these men wouldn't take steroids if society/women didn't reward them for having a chiseled (and often times unnatural) aesthetic, so considering it gender affirming care is a stretch in the general sense.

Only tangential to the theme, but continuing your thought, in my experience the rewards for having a chiselled aesthetic comes more from men than women. It's a status marker amongst (some groups of) men. The heavily muscled male look is more of a male fantasy than female.

What women say they are attracted to, and what they respond positively to IRL, are not the same.

A chiseled look not enough to land someone on its own, but it absolutely will get you a conversation from women who otherwise would not have even talked to you.

Re: Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Living in FL (the home of TRT therapy) I’m blown away with what I see regularly at the gym. Like RFK you will regularly (every day) see men in their 60s that have the muscle mass and definition of someone in their 20s. It’s still a lot of hard work, and I’m not calling it cheating, but it’s extremely obvious. There’s a lot of talk of female beauty standards but looking at The Rock, Hugh Jackman, and countless others…

Muscular actors are almost without exceptions on it. Take Chris Hemsworth, he went from skinny to bodybuilder level of muscle. It would be fine if doesn't use it to sell workout programs.

Exactly - I don't have a problem with it. It's just very, very dangerous (and sleazy) to give the public and society the impression these results are obtainable with some random diet, over the counter supplement, etc.

Doubly sleazy for those that are selling something claiming it's how they achieved their results. Not unlike the Kardashians selling some juice, make up, or whatever and attributing their appearance to it. The real answer is lighting, all kinds of editing/tuning apps, surgery, extreme and regular dermatological procedures, veneers, etc. It's their job and they employ every single trick in the book possible and then some to achieve these results.

It's incredible how far the standards have moved. I was re-watching Terminator 2 the other day. Looking at Arnold Schwarzenegger in that role his physique is more-or-less the standard for "action heroes" today and needless to say he's essentially a freak of nature (and has openly discussed his steroid use). There have been advancements in sport and exercise training but not nearly enough to make up that difference.

Christian Bale went from a "should be hospitalized" gaunt physique in The Machinist to Batman in a year - that's just not possible without chemical intervention.

Re: Are one million people in the UK using anabolic steroids? (2022)

#78
post #5

"Maybe steroid abuse is too common" was my thought after watching a shirtless RFK Jr (69) do pushups the other day.

How about a different politician talking about steroids: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/arnold-schwarzenegg...
Post reply on HN