I mean, I get it, it was a clown show. And yes, give it 15 minutes of fame, because it's the Titanic and all. But I feel like some people care about this far more than I can understand, and the news cycle on this is quite protracted. People die in stupid ways every day and this doesn't seem more egregious than most.
Most people that die in stupid ways aren't rich. That's the difference
The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
71–80 of 98 posts
Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#72I mean, I get it, it was a clown show. And yes, give it 15 minutes of fame, because it's the Titanic and all. But I feel like some people care about this far more than I can understand, and the news cycle on this is quite protracted. People die in stupid ways every day and this doesn't seem more egregious than most.
It's a pretty interesting case study on safety culture. Dying in a stupid way is often preventable, and yet we just accept it, for probably some of the same reasons Rush did.
Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#73Everything is an accident waiting to happen. That's what an accident is. Driving to work, that's an accident waiting to happen. Consider all the poorly signed roads, drivers of various states of sobriety and rage. The sub was in use for years, they did well to engineer within their budget. There's always someone pointing out something wrong, nothing would get done if you actioned every single 'concern'
Perhaps this wouldn't have been possible on their budget... But I think I'd rather have no sub than a sub full of dead people.
Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#74Photos of the recovered debris show an intact titanium end bell being lifted by a strap through where the acrylic porthole was. No sign of porthole or carbon fiber tube. Not yet clear what failed first, the tube or the porthole.
The article mentions that at one point the viewport only had a depth rating only 1,300 meters, but it’s not clear if it was upgraded later on. The more I think about it, would it have been able to withstand even the first dive to Titanic depths without it being upgraded?
Equipment rated for depths of 1,300 will be capable of several times that, possibly only reaching immediate material failure at 8,000 meters. But there's a reason you have a FOS; you want to be well within your material limits, not pushing it close to breaking point. After multiple trips that material could be weaker, or an unexpected stress could cause early failure.
Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, the fact that Rush seemed to have designed the company to avoid liability with US alone is worth the read.
Perhaps he forgot the ultimate liability is himself aboard.
Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#76I mean, I get it, it was a clown show. And yes, give it 15 minutes of fame, because it's the Titanic and all. But I feel like some people care about this far more than I can understand, and the news cycle on this is quite protracted. People die in stupid ways every day and this doesn't seem more egregious than most.
Most people that die in stupid ways aren't rich. That's the difference
Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#77The pilot is somewhat aware but says nothing to the customers?
Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#78Re: The Titan Submersible Was “An Accident Waiting to Happen”
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure but we're in a string of silicon valley come to Jesus moments and finally having a case where the founder was so deluded they got even themselves killed is going to get airtime. I don't think there's be nearly as much interest in this story if we weren't in also dealing with Theranos and FTX and the aftereffects of Cambridge analytica etc etc
OceanGate, FTX, and Cambridge Analytica were not headquartered in Silicon Valley. Out of the companies on your list Silicon Valley can only take the blame for Theranos.