Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ofcourse it is an oversimplification but it really is that simple. If the business is profitable, it will survive. If its still relying on free money to pay the bills, its time to make it profitable.
The fact whether a startup has positive cashflow or not isn't really reflective of whether that is a worthwhile startup or a bad one, but rather whether it's at an early stage or a relatively mature one. The most bestest startup in the world would still be relying on investor's money to pay the bills if it's just starting to build its product and the time to make it profitable will come in a year or two or more (e.g.…
A start-up that fails because of this mismanaged their treasury, didn’t pull money in time, couldn’t borrow against their claims and couldn’t convince anyone to advance payroll. That’s reflective on leadership. It’s a teachable moment. But it points to deeper naivety.