Earlier quoted context omitted.
Keynes divided liquidity preference into transaction demand, precautionary demand and speculative demand. Transaction demand refers to earning money with a job or business and then spending it. Precautionary demand refers to demand for money based around uncertainty in the future, you keep some money around because you want to insure against losing your job (rainy day fund) and finally, once you have so much money yo…
Historically, times where there have been excess liquidity and new technical development along with a labour shortage result in an Industrial Revolution. We have all of these things right now. Consider that newcomen’s engine was based on prior engines, and itself wasn’t that much of a success - but everything that followed was explosive in terms of the changes wrought on society and industry. The technology was inter…
What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
71–80 of 151 posts
Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#72Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#73I interpret "excess liquidity" to mean that there is a larger than average share of people, businesses, or governments that have enough excess wealth to want, need, or be required to invest that excess wealth. i.e. There are more people with money that needs to be spent. I interpret "sloshing around" to be a metaphor for the damage that can be caused to various markets (real estate, stock, etc) by a sudden increase i…
The part that I don't get is why the money is sloshing. Edit: That is to say, why is the liquidity moving from place to place. To follow the analogy, If I put water in a bucket, it levels relatively quickly. Why does the liquidity "slosh" around for years.
Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#74Until there is a widely available open source model of how the economic system works (here and now) people will go on beating about the bush in eternal cycles. The elements for this to happen are actually there. We are not talking about a detailed replica with real time data, but a reasonably accurate model that includes all the public data from central banks, private bank statements, public market valuations etc. Wi…
Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#75Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
> which favors distributed decisionmaking: [...] price Seeing as the top 10% hold over 60% of the wealth (in the US, globally we have a dozen people with as much wealth as the bottom 50%), I don't see how this follows.
We still arrive at concensus based on a (more or less free) market. Weights on this market are heavily skewed to the top, that's true. And as I said, democratic votes also don't exactly live up to the cultural standard that we at least say we have. But in general, we're very far away from a planned economy.
Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#77For one concrete data point refer to this[1] chart which tracks the mortgage backed securities (MBS) held by the fed. This is fed creating money (for the lack of a better word) to indirectly fund home ownership. What started out as a short term measure to avoid a Great Depression post 2008[2] crisis ended up being a more permanent policy fixture. That is about $2.7T of new money created since 2008. Let that sink in.…
Is 2.3T a lot? Since the US GDP is about 23T, is there a situation where printing that much money is a net positive thing?
The easier comparison would be to compare the money supply growth against the GDP growth and see if they differ by much. I have neither number on hands, so someone else might be able to provide them.
Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#78I interpret "excess liquidity" to mean that there is a larger than average share of people, businesses, or governments that have enough excess wealth to want, need, or be required to invest that excess wealth. i.e. There are more people with money that needs to be spent. I interpret "sloshing around" to be a metaphor for the damage that can be caused to various markets (real estate, stock, etc) by a sudden increase i…
The part that I don't get is why the money is sloshing. Edit: That is to say, why is the liquidity moving from place to place. To follow the analogy, If I put water in a bucket, it levels relatively quickly. Why does the liquidity "slosh" around for years.
Interest rates are essentially an indication of how expensive money is. When interest rates are low, money is "cheap".
Outside of the FED purchasing bonds, Banks giving loans is another way to "print money". So when interest rates are low, more people and businesses take out loans, and as a consequence there is more money circulating, "sloshing around", in the economy.
There are other factors at work though, outside of interest rates, that can cause wealth to pool.
Various forces since the mid-1990s in the United States, mostly related to the tax and regulatory environment of corporate compensation packages (i.e. paying senior employees in stock, etc), have caused net wealth transfers to the upper classes. The wealth gains those classes have achieved also causes them to have excess wealth that wants to go somewhere.
Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#79I interpret "excess liquidity" to mean that there is a larger than average share of people, businesses, or governments that have enough excess wealth to want, need, or be required to invest that excess wealth. i.e. There are more people with money that needs to be spent. I interpret "sloshing around" to be a metaphor for the damage that can be caused to various markets (real estate, stock, etc) by a sudden increase i…
Re: What does “excess liquidity sloshing around the financial system” mean?
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
The part that I don't get is why the money is sloshing. Edit: That is to say, why is the liquidity moving from place to place. To follow the analogy, If I put water in a bucket, it levels relatively quickly. Why does the liquidity "slosh" around for years.
The rationale that seems most reasonable to me is decades of low interest rates. Interest rates are essentially an indication of how expensive money is. When interest rates are low, money is "cheap". Outside of the FED purchasing bonds, Banks giving loans is another way to "print money". So when interest rates are low, more people and businesses take out loans, and as a consequence there is more money circulating, "s…