we just do things differnetly here
upper crust of socialm mediaz
71–80 of 533 posts
we just do things differnetly here
upper crust of socialm mediaz
[flagged]
It works both ways - a CEO throwing out resumes with prejudice means the candidate doesn't have to suffer a prejudiced CEO, "big boy company" already says a lot about the culture you're trying to foster.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unless he resigns along with the people he lets go, there is no accountability.
Would that really be desirable for the 80% who remain? More than likely, any career CEO who would be brought in to replace him would likely continue staffing cuts, not reverse them.
While 20% is a lot - how far back does this bring the headcount? A lot of these companies have what seem to be large reductions in staff but are more of a correction of insane hiring sprees.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't see the difference in mechanisms. Getting rich through pump and dump vs getting rich through making or doing something people find valuable.
I think we're past believing that our top .1% is bringing value that's worth billions of times more than the rest of the population. They're all hoarding wealth and offloading risk on others, it's just that in comparison, the crypto-rich are not (yet?) a social class with an army of lobbyists on its payroll.
Fortunately, we do not have to rely on our beliefs here, we have an objective measure, which we call "money".
If someone starts a company in their garage, and a decade later that company is worth few billions of dollars then that's the value this person brought to society - because people willingly paid them those billions of dollars for their product/service.
Of course the whole logic breaks down with purely speculative financial assets such as crypto.
The stock jumped 15% yesterday before this was public information. Coincidence? I think not.
[flagged]
That seems needlessly ideological. If the engineer can do what you want of them what does it matter what their employment history is?
Being involved in crypto related things is a huge red flag that the person is most likely deeply immoral, greedy and opportunistic, which are traits that will most likely make the person hard to work with for the other team members.
I think throwing them out entirely might be a bit extreme, but stamping them with a big fat red-flag and moving them to the bottom of the pile seems totally reasonable to me.
[flagged]
The comp and bennies tend to be extremely good, and the technical challenges are fascinating enough to make the work engaging.