Live data from Hacker News

Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

youtube.com

71–80 of 173 posts

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Steve Jobs was smart enough to not be dumb in public. That is a very, very important factor.

I haven’t seen Musk have a temper tantrum in public.

I find that difficult to imagine, but a recent one (over the past week) registered several times on the HN front page.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#72
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Go back to Elon learning, during an interview, the things Buzz Aldrin—a childhood hero of his—said about SpaceX. Is there a typo here? Can someone explain what this means in slightly different words? I've love to hear what Buzz Aldrin has to say about Elon Musk, but I just can't parse this phrase.

Native speaker here! Parsing backwards: Buzz Aldrin said (implicitly negative) things about SpaceX. Elon heard the comments he made for the first time during a recorded interview. Elon (implicitly) reacted in a negative/foolish way during the interview, because he idolised Aldrin as a child and was upset to hear these comments.

Thank you. Sorry HN.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#73
post #33

One thing that's interesting here is how Jobs doesn't answer the specific technical question: How does Java address the ideas embodied in OpenDoc? Instead, Jobs answers the question behind the question: What role should new technologies play at Apple going forward? This is a very useful technique to practice. When asked a question whose premise you don't agree with, you can become confrontational on that point. Or yo…

I'm not disputing your point - This is a very useful technique to practice - this awareness of what people are really asking. Unfortunately this is a twin edged sword - politicians for example will frequently reach in to the question they've been asked and answer the question they want to answer, not the real question that's beneath the surface. So much so, to the point that they look disingenuous or false. Jobs' spe…

I want to second this being both a valuable talent used for good, and a method of deception.

In the use for good case, it can also be valuable to reference the asked question and explain how it’s related. In many cases this is a good heuristic for whether the answer was intended as help or misdirection.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#74
post #15

I can't believe people compare Jobs with Musk. Jobs was so much better put together in public and seems like he can still be very coherent and persuasive even when angry (likely in this video) and insulted in public.

I love Apple products and have since childhood, and I have little doubt Jobs’ personality, thinking, and talent, are major factors in what I liked about Apple then and do now. And I detest Musk. That disclosure out of the way… Jobs was notoriously quick to anger, imperious in his internal role, very selectively rational, and generally… well, often kind of a jerk. I know all of that can overlap with coherence and pers…

That “poor soul” was a senior director of marketing, not some minimum wage assistant. And violence, a bit hyperbolic, it was an underhanded toss - no one calls that “chucking” where I’m from at least. Sure he had a temper but this is painting a misleading picture of that episode.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#75
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t think he was anywhere close to angry. It seems to me by his affect that he regards the audience member as simply not knowing any better about the big picture and what needed to be done to turn Apple around from its darkest days.

I agree, he doesn't look even remotely angry. The guy asking the question sure did, but Jobs looked pretty relaxed. And his response was amazing . No wonder he could create the Reality Distortion Field ;).

I posit that Jobs was angry but that his Realty Distortion Field was extremely effective this time.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I seriously doubt Steve Jobs would be.

> doubt Steve Jobs would be Jobs was alive when Twitter went mainstream. He didn’t fall for the bait.

Agree. Jobs saved his public appearances/commentary for big events.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#77

I mean if you listen closely Jobs straight up contradicts himself.

People who don't understand the dude's question on a technical level don't realize how much doublespeak Jobs is using here.

Can you elaborate? I don't understand the dude's question on a technical level.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Native speaker here! Parsing backwards: Buzz Aldrin said (implicitly negative) things about SpaceX. Elon heard the comments he made for the first time during a recorded interview. Elon (implicitly) reacted in a negative/foolish way during the interview, because he idolised Aldrin as a child and was upset to hear these comments.

Thank you. Sorry HN.

I was just trying to understand. No reason for apologizing, communication problems happen :)

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#79
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "You've got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. You can't start with the technology and try to figure out where you're going to try to sell it." Crypto still hasn't figured this out. The entire focus is on how to get people using the technology. If you start out being completely unwilling to use a database, that should be a red flag you're falling into this trap. Would a bloc…

Jobs importantly said the customer experience . Remember Jobs also famously said: “Some people say, "Give the customers what they want." But that's not my approach. Our job is to figure out what they're going to want before they do. I think Henry Ford once said, "If I'd asked customers what they wanted, they would have told me, 'A faster horse!'" People don't know what they want until you show it to them. That's why…

The structure of the above comment almost sounds as if it were in opposition to the parent quote. It is important to note that the two quotes are in harmony with one another.

Delivering something of value to those who didn’t even know it was needed is part of what has made Apple very successful. The technologist’s perspective may be “no wireless, less space than Nomad” but the improved focus on consumer experience and perception isn’t ”merely marketing,” it’s market making.

Re: Steve Jobs Insult Response (1997) [video]

#80
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love Apple products and have since childhood, and I have little doubt Jobs’ personality, thinking, and talent, are major factors in what I liked about Apple then and do now. And I detest Musk. That disclosure out of the way… Jobs was notoriously quick to anger, imperious in his internal role, very selectively rational, and generally… well, often kind of a jerk. I know all of that can overlap with coherence and pers…

That “poor soul” was a senior director of marketing, not some minimum wage assistant. And violence, a bit hyperbolic, it was an underhanded toss - no one calls that “chucking” where I’m from at least. Sure he had a temper but this is painting a misleading picture of that episode.

You know what, I looked it up, you’re right, and this is an incredibly poor example of the point. I will stop using this example of Steve Jobs being an asshole.
Post reply on HN