Live data from Hacker News

GoDaddy is scrambling to do damage control

plus.google.com

71–77 of 77 posts

Re: GoDaddy is scrambling to do damage control

#71
post #51
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's only been a day or two. GoDaddy is getting free press but bad press. It's getting name recognition but not the kind it wants. This will have a dramatic effect on the image of the company, and personally I want to see how GoDaddy handles this and what effect it has on the company and its competitors, if any, as well as the effect on the bill's passage, if any. I'll agree that some of the revelry may be unwarrante…

As they say: "there's no such thing as bad publicity" . This old maxim is particularly true when the publicity helps you to come up as the #1 search result for "domain registration" (or worse, links directly to your press releases), and most of your customers don't care about your position on SOPA. Every seething blog post you vote up to the front page of HN sends potential customers to GoDaddy, if only to see what t…

“There's no such thing as bad publicity” is a highly profession-dependent proposition.

Re: GoDaddy is scrambling to do damage control

#73
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This says he represents (among other places) much of Austin . Isn't Austin a tech hotbed? Surely there are a couple hundred people in his district who have a lot at stake here? Judging from the campaign rhetoric I've heard, "XYZ's policy destroyed [or will destroy] my business" definitely speaks to Republican primary voters.

It's a ridiculously gerrymandered district, winding around to catch the Republican precincts in Austin. I live in the district. Sure, I'll drop him an email. Just for the exercise. I've done it before. There's zero chance he'll react. You can't vote this guy out of office with a district like this. He collects the big money -- not from constituents, but from The Interests -- as Judiciary chairman. Untouchable.

I live in Cedar Park, which is Judge Carter's district. I called to see where he stood on SOPA, only to find out he's not only a supporter, but a cosponsor. Williamson County is a similarly safe district, so it doesn't cost Carter anything to support his buddy. My goal for the next few years is to make sure that it costs him a lot more than he anticipated.

Re: GoDaddy is scrambling to do damage control

#74
post #6

So, who's next? It's going to be immensely tougher to demonstrate power against the media moguls as directly.

I've been considering for some weeks whether I can simply go "cold turkey" on paid, mainstream media for a period of time. When I consider this, I have enough backlog of reading and (legitimately free, e.g. SICP and the like) online videos in my mental queue to do so. I might -- really -- be better off for doing so. I haven't formulated a well-worded proposal and scenario/approach to share, but I would suggest workin…

I can't determine just where in the resulting sub-threads to repy, so I'm just replying to myself.

Scope of, um, "boycott": I have lots of material at hand that I've already purchased. That can provide many hours of interest/entertainment. My purpose is not to "empty my life" of such things; it is to reduce the immediate cash flow of these companies. I'll read the book I've already purchased, or rewatch the DVD I liked enough to buy in the first place. Or... go to the library.

Libraries have been receiving somewhat short shrift in the last decade (in the U.S.), although I've read of an uptick in patronage since the economic crisis hit. I support the library model, and I'm not opposed to some purchases being made by libraries who then share the work in a socially and legally codified manner. Libraries have mostly "been on our side", and the side-effect of my boycott lending support to my local libraries would be a welcome one, to me.

"Honest" publishers. I also don't want to lump "everone" into the same boat. I've long been a pretty good patron of O'Reilly Publishing, and I have some works from Manning, Pragmatic Programmers, etc. lying around. All these companies sell me quality works (well, if I pick well) and are willing to give me digital formats free of DRM. Tim's been more than fair in allowing me to "upgrade" my existing printed books to digital format. Such fairness I reciprocate by continuing to support their businesses.

My relationship with media: Actually, this is where I become a bit... "rhetorical", if not disingenuous. I don't actually purchase that much, myself. My cable tv service level is basic, because the pricing works out the same as it would be with Internet-alone and because broadcast reception was poor and vanished altogether when the roof was replaced. Yes, I'm stuck with a cable company for my Internet. Like much of the country, I don't really have a choice. The one competitor -- if they've finally fixed their "last mile" problem to my particular location -- is a major telco whose policies and behavior if anything are actually worse. So, I'm screwed, on this point, as I can't do without the connection.

I don't purchase much music. I mostly listen to what I have.

DVD's, I also only purchase a handful every few years.

My one other consistent source of active spending is Netflix. I feel for them, being stuck between the entertainment industry, the cable companies and telco's, and viewers -- their users. Their position reminds me in the abstract of the recurrent admonition: "Don't be a share-cropper." However... those dollars are flowing to the entertainment industry. In the form of Netflix subscriber levels and revenue, they represent a distinct and readily -- frequently -- measured metric. And Netflix recent bumblings have chilled me somewhat in my support -- in part, regardless of how much I like them, I've come to perceive just how badly, fundamentally, their model is broken when viewed in the current context.

So... do I drop to a minimum level, or pull the plug altogether? They maintain one's existing queue's for 18 months, so I wouldn't have to reconstruct those -- and they are also save-able as a simple web page. They make it pretty easy to leave -- to their credit.

I guess a primary concern about my relationship to media is that I find myself too often settling for the crappy distraction of the basic cable service, because it's there and is immediate. I don't discover some interesting new music because I'm not purchasing the latest equipment and streaming and giving Jobs, now Cook, his pound of flesh, etc.

As it is, I let too much crap into my life. And yes, Mz, I know the situation of seeking, needing simple, mindless distraction from discomfort.

Here's the thing, though. That movie, that song, is still available next year. Still new -- with that initial joy of discovery -- to me. And sometimes, the slight remove means I can skip the crap and let the cream filter to the top before I partake.

It's hard to be social, I guess, when you're disconnected. And part of being young is to be social, if not more actively so nonetheless in a different, more novel mode engendering new contacts and relationships.

But the current situation -- SOPA et al. -- threatens a lot of that novelty. The coolest stuff mostly doesn't come from the maw of Disney -- not once you're old enough to make your own purchases. And we're not talking forever. We're talking some weeks or months. Which could be novel in itself.

Don't purchase that album or DVD. Go see a local band. Check out the theater. I'm fortunate in that where I live, there's tons of it at reasonable price being put on by people of every generation.

I apologize for placing such an early morning hazed ramble on HN. But, at a first pass, there's my response. Make it about choice, and quality. Make it novel and something to do. Turn the "absence" into a positive, or several positives. And take a swing at the knees of these bastards who want to spend us into their suck.

Re: GoDaddy is scrambling to do damage control

#75
post #68
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"It's all about money" is a one-dimensional caricature that really doesn't reflect the way most congresspeople actually think. Money matters, of course, but it's not the only thing that matters.

Well, I proposed three dimensions! Check out that podcast I linked. Short of running as or supporting your own candidate, it's kind of how politicians are swayed in any democracy. If you walked up to a representative and say, "I have these many thousands of members in your constituency, all of whom manage or work in large companies or other institutions and we suggest you do this or that" then that politician is like…

> If you walked up to a representative and say, "I have these many thousands of members in your constituency, all of whom manage or work in large companies or other institutions and we suggest you do this or that" then that politician is likely to take notice.

Nope. He'd say "you and everyone else who talks with me".

Most House members represent about 720k people. (310M/435 and small states get at least one regardless of population.) On almost any issue, there are "thousands" of people on both sides.

Re: GoDaddy is scrambling to do damage control

#76
post #6

So, who's next? It's going to be immensely tougher to demonstrate power against the media moguls as directly.

I've been considering for some weeks whether I can simply go "cold turkey" on paid, mainstream media for a period of time. When I consider this, I have enough backlog of reading and (legitimately free, e.g. SICP and the like) online videos in my mental queue to do so. I might -- really -- be better off for doing so. I haven't formulated a well-worded proposal and scenario/approach to share, but I would suggest workin…

> and that includes me as far as needing to keep up with the news

You don't actually "need" to keep up with the news. It's not a sin not to, nobody's forcing you, and if something really important happens, it'll filter down to you via your friends.

I did this a decade ago and it was really refreshing. I did start following the news again at some point, but if you plan on just a month or two, there's nothing except a self-appointed "duty" why you "need" to keep up with the news.

Not that following the news is a bad thing or anything (rather the contrary) and maybe it is the most important form of media consumption, but it's not that important either, especially if you got a reasonably active social life.

Re: GoDaddy is scrambling to do damage control

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been considering for some weeks whether I can simply go "cold turkey" on paid, mainstream media for a period of time. When I consider this, I have enough backlog of reading and (legitimately free, e.g. SICP and the like) online videos in my mental queue to do so. I might -- really -- be better off for doing so. I haven't formulated a well-worded proposal and scenario/approach to share, but I would suggest workin…

> and that includes me as far as needing to keep up with the news You don't actually "need" to keep up with the news. It's not a sin not to, nobody's forcing you, and if something really important happens, it'll filter down to you via your friends. I did this a decade ago and it was really refreshing. I did start following the news again at some point, but if you plan on just a month or two, there's nothing except a…

Well, actually I do, for... let's call it reasons of "due diligence". I have obligations and responsibilities that could go wrong if I'm not sufficiently informed.
Post reply on HN